That's racist!

Not that I’m aware of. I definitely have not seen a video of a brawl other than the one most circulated or the other video.

There is another video of an older white man (early 60s) who’s obviously intoxicated and is using racial slurs. Those involved are not resorting to gangland behavior on either side and most are walking away from each other. Also, it doesn’t appear he’s associated with the other couple that were assaulted.
Oh I’m sure somebody said something that helped set that thing off.

I’m curious if one of the members of the other group will be charged with assault or aggravated riot as well. As police contend it was a “brawl”.
 
Oh I’m sure somebody said something that helped set that thing off.

I’m curious if one of the members of the other group will be charged with assault or aggravated riot as well. As police contend it was a “brawl”.

There’s talk of that. Possible charges against those assaulted.
 

In showcasing her “great jeans,” Sweeney doesn’t posture. She doesn’t apologize for her “privilege” — whether attractiveness, “whiteness”, or able-bodiedness. She doesn’t pretend that her ads are activism. She simply exists — luminous, intact, and unburdened by the guilt that academia falsely equates with social awareness. Her image disrupts the narrative that joy signifies ignorance of ongoing injustices.

She thus represents a loss of control for the prevailing ideological apparatus, which demands punishment. Her campaign is read in bad faith as complicity with oppression, despite her neutrality. She is scapegoated not because she provokes, but because she doesn’t: Her femininity goes unexplored, her body isn’t a battleground, and her looks are not an indictment of the structural powers-that-be. In a moral order built on struggle, her wholeness is heresy. She threatens by refusing to seek validation from frameworks demanding constant self-scrutiny. She simply is—a direct affront to those who built careers teaching that selfhood must always be in crisis.

She’s definitely guilty of committing Violence via Silence

This is not a critique of students but a reckoning with the adults who taught them to see “silence”, or political neutrality, as violence.
 
Overall, there were three times as many posts supportive of the campaign and Ms. Sweeney on X as there were posts critical of them in the days after the campaign began, the analysis by The Times showed.

I would expect there to be 3x the number of posts in support vs against.
Considering it was beyond retarded to suggest Nazi eugenics and racist dog whistles.






 
I would expect there to be 3x the number of posts in support vs against.
Considering it was beyond retarded to suggest Nazi eugenics and racist dog whistles.






A bunch of articles from a full week or more after the ad was first discussed on Twitter on 7/24-26 lol, just like the last sentence of this middle paragraph

IMG_2039.png
 
A bunch of articles from a full week or more after the ad was first discussed on Twitter on 7/24-26 lol, just like the last sentence of this middle paragraph

View attachment 762297
Yes, you’ve posted that same thing at least 3 or 4 times now. Not surprised at all it took 1 week to enter the larger zeitgeist.

And again, not all surprised that the retarded cries of “racist dog whistles” and “Nazi eugenics” were outnumbered 3:1

That ^ would be expected
 
Yes, you’ve posted that same thing at least 3 or 4 times now. Not surprised at all it took 1 week to enter the larger zeitgeist.

And again, not all surprised that the retarded cries of “racist dog whistles” and “Nazi eugenics” were outnumbered 3:1

That ^ would be expected
I posted that twice. It didn't "enter the larger zeitgeist" organically, conservatives just spent a lot of time lying about the reaction to it. Using the R word repeatedly doesn't make you cooler or more edgy
 
Advertisement

Back
Top