hog88
Your ray of sunshine
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2008
- Messages
- 123,115
- Likes
- 183,612
"Threatening" was not the context, just "surrounding my car" which no is not a justification for killing someone. Look at you making things up and performatively reacting to themSo you are presenting the possibility that @C-south wasn't having murder fantasies about killing protesters in the street that aren't surrounding cars and threatening people, even though the context was escaping people who are surrounding his car and threatening him?
As much as I like you as a poster, you go a bridge too far to be taken seriously this time.
Here. I'll help by quoting the reply that directed what followed."Threatening" was not the context, just "surrounding my car" which no is not a justification for killing someone. Look at you making things up and performatively reacting to them
You wouldn't be concerned if a mob of people surrounded your car with you/your family inside?
I believe he said it would be viewed as self defense especially when rioters attack the vehicles and chase them.
This is what spawned the conversation. Having to lie and strawman to make your point is beneath you, or at least it should be. Doing that and accusing someone else of "misrepresenting" is worseHere. I'll help by quoting the reply that directed what followed.
And the reply that spawned the entire conversation even earlier:
So either you waded in and accused someone of murder-fantasies out of ignorance, or you purposefully misrepresented the conversation to create an opportunity to do so. Neither is a good look.
If they surround my car, there WILL be a medical emergency. And it won’t be me needing the ambulance
You are so weak, bro.
You wouldn't be concerned if a mob of people surrounded your car with you/your family inside?
The options aren't "run people over with your car or die," certain people just love imagining that scenario
apologies if I brought miscommunication to the convo, too. When I was thinking about a mob of people surrounding my car, the default was a mob of angry, irrational people. Nash prompted more clarity distinguishing in different types of mobs with his reply to my post.Here. I'll help by quoting the reply that directed what followed.
And the reply that spawned the entire conversation even earlier:
So either you waded in and accused someone of murder-fantasies out of ignorance, or you purposefully misrepresented the conversation to create an opportunity to do so. Neither is a good look.
apologies if I brought miscommunication to the convo, too. When I was thinking about a mob of people surrounding my car, the default was a mob of angry, irrational people. Nash prompted more clarity distinguishing in different types of mobs with his reply to my post.
I gave you the context in which those posts were made. Forcing a needlessly narrow interpretation to create an opportunity to accuse someone of murder fantasies is **** posting. Period.This is what spawned the conversation. Having to lie and strawman to make your point is beneath you, or at least it should be. Doing that and accusing someone else of "misrepresenting" is worse
If they are in the road blocking traffic then they are not protestors. Legal protests are set up to keep traffic and people apart. When people no longer stick to the rules of the protest, they become rioters. For some strange reason, people seem to think you can just protest anytime you feel like it. It's not that way. You have rules and regs just like anything else. Riots are not protests.Only if they could do so without damaging their bumper![]()
