So, you'd rather be good with crappy reasons. That's your answer.
I didnt say anything. Neither are ideal. And neither is absolute.
Im my example above Im choosing to donate to charity for selfish reasons over being a murdering rapist 10/10 times. But thats not always the case for every situation.
Youd rather be a murdering rapist who was severely abused as a child than a tax cheat who donated a ton to charity to get the tax break? Perhaps Im not following.
Now you have me wondering what happened to dink as a child that made him such a crappy person today.
It depends on the situation.
So, you're not committed to relying on the best reasons available to you. A commitment is a commitment.
Your answer suggests, very strongly, that you place more esteem in how you'll be evaluated by others than in your own reasoning process.
That's fine. Most do this.
I'd rather not.
Take a look in the mirror. Record yourself for a week and keep a log of everything you type on a computer or phone.
Hell, you dont even need to look to the past. Youll have your answer in the next week.
Youre welcome.
So, you're not committed to relying on the best reasons available to you. A commitment is a commitment.
Your answer suggests, very strongly, that you place more esteem in how you'll be evaluated by others than in your own reasoning process.
That's fine. Most do this.
I'd rather not.
I didnt commit to anything in your game.
Those arent the best reasons only because you want them to be. People arent broken down to only those two very vague options you concocted. Also, need specifics.
Do you value intent over outcome or outcome over intent?
If the best available reasons to that person say to beat their kid...
Cool.
So, if you grew up thinking green is red then you think green is in fact red because you have a reason to you to believe its red. At the end of the day green is green....
What best available reasons are there to rape a woman?
Because logic extends to the extremes.