bleedorange0037
Senior Member
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2007
- Messages
- 15,187
- Likes
- 1,772
I think this is fairly solid analysis. At the end of the day, we beat a team that was smaller and slower than we were at almost every position.
For me, the most important facet of the game was this team actually came out of the locker room at halftime. In a way, the 2nd quarter fumble was a great piece of adversity for this team to overcome. And they overcame it with some style.
Despite the win, I was ready to jettison Chaney during the game. His philosophy on the running game just seems anathema to Tennessee. However, on reflection:
1. For the first time in the Dooley era, the Vols put together a tough, clock eating, 3rd quarter drive that effectively put a fork in the opposition.
2. Running out of the pistol had to be some sort of subterfuge to confuse Muschamp and Co.
Judgment Day on Jim Chaney is definitely Sep 15th.
For me, this might be the best takeaway from the opening game. After the way the first half ended, I was entirely convinced during halftime that we were going to lose the game. There was nothing from either of Dooley's past teams to make me think that they were going to overcome that adversity and finish the game off. They completely proved me wrong, and I was glad to see it happen.
