This is exactly true of Fulmer's W-L stats, except that the bottom of the SEC was much weaker then and the top consisted of fewer teams.I'm not going to judge this team by the overall record because the non-conference schedule is an absolute joke!... WKU, Ohio, and Memphis wins can artificially inflate a bad season in a decent looking overall method. I'm looking at the SEC schedule only.
A 4-4 or 5-3 SEC record would be success in my opinion given the mess that foolmer left.
I was about to post something similar...The problem is that so far we haven't shown week to week improvement. Our quality of play reads like a heart monitor. We're up, then we're down, we're up, then we're down! I'm really hoping this levels off with Auburn and we start playing hard-nosed, fundamentally sound football.
here's what would be a good season. 7-5 regualar season, with consistent improvement throughout the season and a very good showing in the bowl game.
Just to stir the pot - what do you think Fulmer's record would have been with this team?
I'm guessing 5-7
Here is where I am starting to think you may see some dissapointment. It seem more likely to me that you will see a steady decline in overall effectiveness of this team this year as the season progresses.
Now, before you jump all over me, the reason I think that is simply lack of depth. Not Kiffin's fault, and I'm not saying the plaers are going to let up. But as the season wears on, injuries mount, fatigue sets in for the guys having to go without relief, I just think that the most likely scenario is that the Vols end this season worn out and beat up.
A couple of weeks later, when folks are thinking ahead to next year, that will turn around. But in terms of overall performance, the most likely scenario to me is a fall off, not an improvement.
Just to stir the pot - what do you think Fulmer's record would have been with this team?
I'm guessing 5-7