Spain blackout

#27
#27
Actually it was the frequency that dropped below a critical cycle (50 Hz is the design and the grid needs to be between some tight band)
 
Last edited:
#28
#28
As I posted above, the NYT article DOES NOT support the inference that the cause of the outage was renewable sources. It is simply not known yet.

I'm not saying it didn't. I am saying that the anti conservation people are rushing to assume it did, because that supports their narrative. It may turn out to be the case. I don't know. But the quick assumption that it did cannot be supported at this point.
 
#29
#29
As I posted above, the NYT article DOES NOT support the inference that the cause of the outage was renewable sources. It is simply not known yet.

I'm not saying it didn't. I am saying that the anti conservation people are rushing to assume it did, because that supports their narrative. It may turn out to be the case. I don't know. But the quick assumption that it did cannot be supported at this point.

71% of their grid was between solar and wind at the time. Over 50% was solar specifically and the issue was a drop in output of solar from 18 (I forget the unit) to 8.

As the NYT article points out, there’s aspects of solar that make this more likely to occur with a solar grid.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_6126.jpeg
    IMG_6126.jpeg
    132 KB · Views: 2
  • Like
Reactions: norrislakevol
#30
#30
71% of their grid was between solar and wind at the time. Over 50% was solar specifically and the issue was a drop in output of solar from 18 (I forget the unit) to 8.

As the NYT article points out, there’s aspects of solar that make this more likely to occur with a solar grid.


It
Does
Not
Reach
A
Conclusion
As
To
The
Cause



Period.
 
#34
#34


Others have. Others here have leapt to their desired conclusion that the cause was the renewable sources, and they have then claimed the NYT article reached that conclusion.

Unwarranted at this stage.
 
#37
#37
I know nothing about power generation, but what I'm reading (mostly out of Spain, in Spanish) seems to be that the renewables are causing wild fluctuations and instability in the network which caused everything to crash.

If there's one thing I've seen about most renewables at scale, it's that they just plain aren't reliable and consistent. I think there are probably renewable sources we can reliably use without too often touching the backups in some areas (geothermal, hydro) but this reliance on solar and wind, which are incredibly inefficient, is idiotic.

We really ought to be going nuclear.
 
#38
#38
I know nothing about power generation, but what I'm reading (mostly out of Spain, in Spanish) seems to be that the renewables are causing wild fluctuations and instability in the network which caused everything to crash.

If there's one thing I've seen about most renewables at scale, it's that they just plain aren't reliable and consistent. I think there are probably renewable sources we can reliably use without too often touching the backups in some areas (geothermal, hydro) but this reliance on solar and wind, which are incredibly inefficient, is idiotic.

We really ought to be going nuclear.

Nuclear is the answer anywhere that geothermal or hydro isnt gifted from the Earth IMO. Theres even small, self contained reactors now that can be used for areas that don't need a traditional large scale nuclear plant. Theres no reason to have coal fired plants anymore in most cases...but China is building dozens of them as we speak.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tbh and ButchPlz

VN Store



Back
Top