Vol8188
revolUTion in the air!
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2011
- Messages
- 50,293
- Likes
- 49,042
As I posted above, the NYT article DOES NOT support the inference that the cause of the outage was renewable sources. It is simply not known yet.
I'm not saying it didn't. I am saying that the anti conservation people are rushing to assume it did, because that supports their narrative. It may turn out to be the case. I don't know. But the quick assumption that it did cannot be supported at this point.
71% of their grid was between solar and wind at the time. Over 50% was solar specifically and the issue was a drop in output of solar from 18 (I forget the unit) to 8.
As the NYT article points out, there’s aspects of solar that make this more likely to occur with a solar grid.
I know nothing about power generation, but what I'm reading (mostly out of Spain, in Spanish) seems to be that the renewables are causing wild fluctuations and instability in the network which caused everything to crash.
If there's one thing I've seen about most renewables at scale, it's that they just plain aren't reliable and consistent. I think there are probably renewable sources we can reliably use without too often touching the backups in some areas (geothermal, hydro) but this reliance on solar and wind, which are incredibly inefficient, is idiotic.
We really ought to be going nuclear.