Ok, let me ask you a question, do you think he deserves to spend 2-6 years in jail possibly for this crime he is accused, and not yet convicted of?? The charge is almost always worse at first, than it ends up being, especially with things like this.
The reason people are often overcharged is because police don't always have all the facts or law on hand when they make an arrest.
Theft cases are particularly tricky because the value of an estimated quantity of copper wire or the hubcaps of a 1985 Ford Fiesta can be difficult to prove. In Cam's case, the value of a Macbook Pro is not at all difficult to determine and it falls comfortably within the range of a D felony.
Legally, Clear could be in seriously hot water. The facts do not look good for him.
The things working in his favor are his lack of criminal history, age, and maybe his family.
Because Cam is legally boned, he has a strong incentive to plead. Because of the above mitigating factors, he's looking at 2 years, not 4. So he has no incentive to plead to 2 years to serve, he can go to trial and get that.
Easy cases like this shouldn't go to trial unless there is some fundamental conflict between the defendant and the State about what the punishment should be. That usually occurs in violent cases. So the prosecutor is probably going to offer something that's easy to plead to, like diversion or a couple of years of probation.
It should go without saying that anyone facing prosecution should ask their attorney what the consequences of any course of action are, and not rely on
anything they read on a message board.