Ericvol2096
Quiz'N'Vol
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2007
- Messages
- 17,422
- Likes
- 26,738
The overwhelming weight of posted opinions seems to be against letting him play again this year, if not forever. If that's the case, then why even keep him on the team? Obviously, they think his talents are such that it is worth taking a P.R. hit to keep him around. That being the case, why not play him? What if, God forbid, Vandy squeeks out a close one without JJ in the game?
Maybe a better question would be, would you rather play JJ and go 8-5 with a Peach Bowl victory, or go 5-7 without JJ? I realize that there are other options, but it was painfully obvious that the defense was not the same without JJ on the field.
Lets see if he passes his drug test. Until those results are available - he may not be on the team. My theory, he was the person who said lets go. But was he stoned? CLK found it disturbing JJ was caught with someone with weed - especially seeing he just got busted for failing a drug test. JJ is waiting for the results of his latest drug test. If he fails, see ya. If he passes, he plays in the bowl game.
The munchies might have gotten the best of JJ.
Can he help us win? Yes. He's not dismissed and already served a 1 game suspension.
All you holier than thou you people are the same one drinking wiskey in church after watching porn all night. Get over yourselves.
Given the timing of his involvement with this (albeit hopefully peripheral) right after his suspension for the Memphis State game, I am a proponent for sitting him the rest of the year and hopefully bringing him back next year.
I am mad! I say supend JJ for the UT Martin game next Year!:realmad:
From what I've been able to gather, he was in the store when the other two pulled their stupid robbery. I think you suspend him for the rest of the regular season (violation of team rules) and bring him back for the bowl game if and only if:
1. It's proven that he had no part in planning or participating in the robbery and all charges are dismissed (or he is found innocent in court).
2. He does absolutely nothing wrong between now and whatever bowl the Vols play in. Being 5 minutes late to a team meeting should be enough to extend his suspension through the bowl game.
Just what I would do. Leaving the bowl game on the table gives him a short-term goal to strive for, and I think that could be an important element in getting his head on straight.
The overwhelming weight of posted opinions seems to be against letting him play again this year, if not forever. If that's the case, then why even keep him on the team? Obviously, they think his talents are such that it is worth taking a P.R. hit to keep him around. That being the case, why not play him? What if, God forbid, Vandy squeeks out a close one without JJ in the game?
Maybe a better question would be, would you rather play JJ and go 8-5 with a Peach Bowl victory, or go 5-7 without JJ? I realize that there are other options, but it was painfully obvious that the defense was not the same without JJ on the field.
Let's assume that JJ had absolutely no idea that any robbery was going down last week.
What was his rush to leave the gas station?
Why was the reason he was out on the town at 2AM on a school night just before a road game? Insomnia?
What a horrible coincidence that he was in a car with marijuana just a week after getting suspended for failing a drug test!
Just how does UT aim to differentiate itself from UF here?