gobraves101035
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2011
- Messages
- 4,148
- Likes
- 2,078
UGA - Chubb looked 100%, which means Smart can probably go with Eason at QB knowing the frehman won't need to carry the offense.
UT/UF - both sort of sleepwalked through their opener.
UK - Can score pts., at least in first half, but D is atrocio. Fortunately for them, Vandy, Mizzou, and SC don't have good enough offenses to exploit that, although if I was Muschamp I would start that freshman DT QB because the UK D is especially awful against running QBs.
Vandy - I put them above Mizzou only because they have a Ralph Webb at RB.
Mizzou - just bad. Nothing else to say.
Look at everyone on UGA jock after they beat a team that gave up 1000 yards rushing to their last TWO opponents last year. Pathetic.
Look at everyone on UGA jock after they beat a team that gave up 1000 yards rushing to their last TWO opponents last year. Pathetic.
Chubb showed up and showed out, but it was late when he broke his last 55 yard TD run ... and was caught from behind. When was the last time you saw someone able to catch Chubb when he was free and wide open??? Chubb's a good back but UGA got a lot of help to win that game. Eason is probably their guy at QB but the UNC RBs regularly ripped off long runs against their D and IMO had the better rushing attack. Rushing game stats bear this out UNC total rushing yds 159 on 19 attempts = 8.4 yds per carry and UGA total rushing yds 289 on 52 attempts = 5.2 ypc. Considering this stat how'd you like to be a Tarheel fan this morning knowing how effective your running game was and you pretty much minimized it???
And by the way, those of you who thought any team in the East, including Tennessee, could compete with Alabama? You are on crack. A ton of it.
It remains the case that the East is way behind the West.
And by the way, those of you who thought any team in the East, including Tennessee, could compete with Alabama? You are on crack. A ton of it.
It remains the case that the East is way behind the West.