85SugarVol
I prefer the tumult of Liberty
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2010
- Messages
- 34,843
- Likes
- 69,541
Imagine boycotting a Hispanic company to fight racism.Imagine firing people based on the color of their skin as a solution to racism.
2020 is wild man.
Wow, it doesn't even sound like the claim was that it would disproportionately affect minorities. Just that it would affect them.
Boy are you in a tizzy. My posts are consistent. Have you even decided yet whether you think SPD/Best stated defunding would disproportionately affect BIPOC? It’s kind of critical to the discussion.You mean this one?
That argued its away around the country to get to this more recent one?
Which led to more arguing, until you finally agreed with us that she's proposing laying off based on race.
So... You don't know if what the chief said was true, but it was race baiting because it was untrue.
And the councilmember didn't call to lay off based on race, but may have, but my saying that she did was a strawman because she didn't, but she actually did and you said so all along.
Did you write the Covid rules too? They sound eerily similar.
And let's not forget that you defended her against the idea of laying off based on race as though it would be a bad thing, and then when you had to agree that's what she was doing, you presented it as though doing so isn't such a bad thing. Eh... It's just a creative way to maintain diversity.
No. It's racist toro caca, and you've been waffling your way through this discussion just to carry water.
Yes, I've decided. I'm not in a tizzy. You're posts have been consistently trying to excuse your bull-ish. You've tied yourself in knots to carry water.Boy are you in a tizzy. My posts are consistent. Have you even decided yet whether you think SPD/Best stated defunding would disproportionately affect BIPOC? It’s kind of critical to the discussion.
Yes, the councilwoman’s statement that layoffs could be done out of order of seniority was in response to Best’s comment. She’s not saying fire the white ones, just that they can go out of order of seniority. There are plenty of criteria out there besides race and seniority.
Yes who wouldn’t jump at a job where you could all get thrown out on your ass on a whim.That is the nuclear option. The city could just refuse to renew the contract with the police union that expires this year and seek labor from a different pool. I hear Trump knows a guy or two...
That would be pretty crazy but we are in uncharted waters.
Yes, I've decided. I'm not in a tizzy.
That never said that it would be disproportionate.
You're posts have been consistently trying to excuse your bull-ish. You've tied yourself in knots to carry water.
If they're going out of order so as not to lay off minorities (which is the context for which she is finding an alternative), they're going out of order to lay off whites.
It's racist toro caca that you're carrying water for. Take a bow.
Contrast that with reality:The solution according to City Council member Lisa Herbold is simple: fire officers based on their race.
This of course would be even more egregious since Herbold wants to fire white officers due to their race alone. They would not be accused of any wrongdoing or failure. The problem is their race.
Herbold would not only refuse to promote on the basis of race but would fire officers on that basis. No test. Just a pure racially discriminatory program of terminations.
Hence, my accusation that OP is a straw man. Look, I understand your point. Yes I even agreed, in part, as I pointed to in my first post. But the above scenarios are far from the same.While Herbold had said the chief could instead opt for “out-of-order” job cuts to preserve some diversity, she says that has been misinterpreted as a suggestion that the chief just fire white officers. Instead, she suggests the chief could use “out of order” as a tool to, for example, cut officers with the biggest records of disciplinary problems. And she contends that a 50 percent budget cut would not require cutting 50 percent of the officers.
Yes who wouldn’t jump at a job where you could all get thrown out on your ass on a whim.
Non-BIPOC minorities feel totally left out of this stupid argument. I wonder what woke millennial in the department came up with that buzzword...And why is she suggesting the SPD chief go out of order?
If the councilwoman wants less non white employees to be fired, then that leaves one racial group to cut from.
It’s not a shock. These programs have been going for a while in some major cities. Someone decided that giving these people a “clean” apparatus for their drug use would help prevent the spreading of who knows what from sharing. These addicts in the streets are desperate people. They will pick up a random straw or syringe off the street if they don’t have one.Moment Woke Seattle 'harm reduction' worker tries to stop reporter filming Taxpayer-Funded Meth Pipes being handed out to Vagrants in Public
Shocking video shows the moment a Seattle-based social worker tried to push and stop a news reporter from filming a drug camp as they distributed 'aid supplies'.
Jonathan Choe was outside Dow Constantine's drug camp in King County when he recorded public workers conducting a 'harm reduction' operation - aimed at providing treatment and medication to those addicted to hard drugs.
In the video, the seasoned Discovery Institute journalist can be seen approaching a van filled with supplies that were being distributed by two people in the camp.
But Choe claims that instead of helping homeless addicts turn their life around, the duo were handing out 'meth pipes' and 'needles'.
'They were giving away needles and fentanyl kits like candy. Not a single person was offered treatment,' he captioned his X post.
View attachment 665797
Jonathan Choe, a local reporter was outside Dow Constantine's drug camp in King County when he recorded public workers (pictured) conducting a 'harm reduction' operation
He also went on to reveal that the bag of supplies he received from the workers shockingly contained huge bags of syringes, pipes, foil and what seemed to be black straws.
As Choe boldly continued to film the welfare workers' activities, he was repeatedly being told to switch his camera off and stop filming.
At one point, one of the aid providers could be seen trying to cover his camera and pushing him away from the van.
While many would expect the pushback from the workers to be worrying enough, Choe later revealed that he ended up being pepper sprayed as he was filming around the camp.
View attachment 665799
In a surprising turn of events, as the social worker kept arguing with the Seattle-based reporter for trying to interview vagrants, a scooter-driving homeless woman (pictured) was seen slashing the philanthropist's tires
![]()
Seattle worker tries to stop filming of meth pipes given to vagrants
Shocking video shows the moment a Seattle-based social worker tried to push and stop reporter Jonathan Choe from filming a drug camp as they distributed 'aid supplies'.www.dailymail.co.uk