#SayHisName Trends After Media Refuse To Report On Alleged Murder Of 5-Year-Old Cannon Hinnant

#26
#26
Do you guys really see no difference between a state actor, sworn to protect and serve the public, intentionally killing a member of the public and some rando walking up to a kid and killing him.

You also got to realize, for better or worse, video footage of the incident, which apparently doesn't exist here, makes it more likely to be played up in the news.
Please tell us the difference. I want to here this.
 
#27
#27
Please tell us the difference. I want to here this.

(1) state actor vs. private citizen; (2) state actor who has specifically sworn to serve and protect the public vs. private citizen with no such obligation.

Do you want it in crayon?
 
#28
#28
Do you guys really see no difference between a state actor, sworn to protect and serve the public, intentionally killing a member of the public and some rando walking up to a kid and killing him.

You also got to realize, for better or worse, video footage of the incident, which apparently doesn't exist here, makes it more likely to be played up in the news.

Only one was intentionally killed here. And I know you cant figure out which one.
 
#30
#30
Are the authorities calling it a hate crime yet or is it just our resident race baiters? Some of you are no better than Al Sharpton.
 
#31
#31
(1) state actor vs. private citizen; (2) state actor who has specifically sworn to serve and protect the public vs. private citizen with no such obligation.

Do you want it in crayon?
They also made a huge deal of the birdwatcher calling the police and pretty much any racial incident that is caught on video
 
#34
#34
Do you guys really see no difference between a state actor, sworn to protect and serve the public, intentionally killing a member of the public and some rando walking up to a kid and killing him.

You also got to realize, for better or worse, video footage of the incident, which apparently doesn't exist here, makes it more likely to be played up in the news.
They're not identical issues. A few weeks ago In Arizona a white guy was murdered by police outside his apartment. Of course you didn't here about that. You didn't because it's not politically expedient. That's the main thing we are bothered with ( aside from that innocent boy being murdered)
 
#35
#35
(1) state actor vs. private citizen; (2) state actor who has specifically sworn to serve and protect the public vs. private citizen with no such obligation.

Do you want it in crayon?
It isn't just white cop/black suspect incidents that get huge attention. The Trayvon Martin shooting got gigantic media interest too. Zimmerman wasn't a cop - hell, he wasn't even white...he was a "white hispanic," remember? lol

Does conservative media want to use this story to run a counternarrative for political purposes? Sure they do, but Matt Walsh (Daily Wire guy) isn't wrong when he says that if the races were reversed this would be the only story people talked about for a month.
 
#36
#36
Do you guys really see no difference between a state actor, sworn to protect and serve the public, intentionally killing a member of the public and some rando walking up to a kid and killing him.

You also got to realize, for better or worse, video footage of the incident, which apparently doesn't exist here, makes it more likely to be played up in the news.
Do you see a difference in George Floyd’s wrongful death getting weeks of coverage to a 5 year old boy’s cold blooded murder getting zero coverage?
 
#38
#38
cant wait til the thug gets his shot at the NC State prison - if he lasts that long
 
#39
#39
This seems like an excuse to paint black people, and more particularly black men, as racist killers.

The comparison of that to a white police officer killing a black suspect, and then framing it as just about media coverage of the two, is camouflage. But hey, that's what Trump and his folks do best. Come up with ways to be racist, but give a false innocent cover story to it, all the while with a silent nod to each other of they know what they really mean. Trump's tweet yesterday about Biden/Harris allowing an "invasion" of suburbia another example of that.
 
#41
#41
This seems like an excuse to paint black people, and more particularly black men, as racist killers.

The comparison of that to a white police officer killing a black suspect, and then framing it as just about media coverage of the two, is camouflage. But hey, that's what Trump and his folks do best. Come up with ways to be racist, but give a false innocent cover story to it, all the while with a silent nod to each other of they know what they really mean. Trump's tweet yesterday about Biden/Harris allowing an "invasion" of suburbia another example of that.

There’s nothing false about reality.
 
#42
#42
This seems like an excuse to paint black people, and more particularly black men, as racist killers.

The comparison of that to a white police officer killing a black suspect, and then framing it as just about media coverage of the two, is camouflage. But hey, that's what Trump and his folks do best. Come up with ways to be racist, but give a false innocent cover story to it, all the while with a silent nod to each other of they know what they really mean. Trump's tweet yesterday about Biden/Harris allowing an "invasion" of suburbia another example of that.

Are you this stupid or are you just getting back into practice on making racial smears now that Kamala is on the ticket?

It looks like an attempt to highlight an obvious double standard regarding what gets over indexed media coverage.
 
#43
#43
This seems like an excuse to paint black people, and more particularly black men, as racist killers.

The comparison of that to a white police officer killing a black suspect, and then framing it as just about media coverage of the two, is camouflage. But hey, that's what Trump and his folks do best. Come up with ways to be racist, but give a false innocent cover story to it, all the while with a silent nod to each other of they know what they really mean. Trump's tweet yesterday about Biden/Harris allowing an "invasion" of suburbia another example of that.
So your reaction to this story is to think that this incident shouldn't be used as an excuse to paint black people, particularly black men, as racist killers. That's correct and a totally fair reaction.

However, I doubt your first reaction to George Floyd's death was "This shouldn't be used as an excuse to paint cops, particularly white cops, as racist killers."

Everybody, regardless of ideology, interprets events through their ideological prism. Magnify stuff that fits your narrative, ignore/downplay stuff that doesn't. It seems like very few people, particularly on the internet/social media, are interested in looking at things from a balanced perspective, or looking at things in context.
 
#45
#45
I'm done with this current iteration of the United States. We don't stand for anything anymore. Every country has it's warts depending on the era but we have completely lost our way. Most of our government is more interested in pandering to thugs on the streets than defending the lives of the innocent. Our current country isn't worth the blood that was spent on it by previous generations


This country doesnt make it as a tue Republic past 2050 unless something changes.
 
#46
#46
This seems like an excuse to paint black people, and more particularly black men, as racist killers.

The comparison of that to a white police officer killing a black suspect, and then framing it as just about media coverage of the two, is camouflage. But hey, that's what Trump and his folks do best. Come up with ways to be racist, but give a false innocent cover story to it, all the while with a silent nod to each other of they know what they really mean. Trump's tweet yesterday about Biden/Harris allowing an "invasion" of suburbia another example of that.
Explain why there has been ZERO coverage.

Not equal coverage.

ZERO COVERAGE.
 
#47
#47
Are you this stupid or are you just getting back into practice on making racial smears now that Kamala is on the ticket?

It looks like an attempt to highlight an obvious double standard regarding what gets over indexed media coverage.


As explained by others here -- and is truly freakin' obvious -- a murder by one civilian of another is not the same as police killing of a suspect. Just not even remotely invoking the same societal issues.

By your standard, the media should not report the death of George Floyd unless they also give equal coverage to every one of the 50 other murders in the country each day. Its just such a ridiculous standard and comparison that it is painful to have to explain this to anyone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ohhbother
#50
#50
Explain why there has been ZERO coverage.

Not equal coverage.

ZERO COVERAGE.


Does MSNBC or CNN really need to report on all 50 murders today?

Fox does it because it appeals to its base viewer -- black man bad, killed innocent white boy.

There is just no way that the people on this issue and itt can possibly be so stupid as not to understand what is going on here.
 

VN Store



Back
Top