n_huffhines
What's it gonna cost?
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2009
- Messages
- 91,490
- Likes
- 55,655
Both are somewhat likely. I just felt like 5 games was more likely.
Sweeps usually only happen when a team quits. I don't see a quitter in the bunch except the hawks and I think they'll win a game.
Just read an article from a few hours ago that quotes Horford saying he's playing in the 1st round. That could change everything. Given the Celtics lack of depth and old age, their starters are going to have to play about 40mpg imo and I'm not sure how they'll hold up. Horford even for 15-20 min a game could really make a difference in this series. He's big, athletic and can shoot. Guess it depends on how he looks in his return, if he does in fact return.
Just read an article from a few hours ago that quotes Horford saying he's playing in the 1st round. That could change everything. Given the Celtics lack of depth and old age, their starters are going to have to play about 40mpg imo and I'm not sure how they'll hold up. Horford even for 15-20 min a game could really make a difference in this series. He's big, athletic and can shoot. Guess it depends on how he looks in his return, if he does in fact return.
Sweeps usually only happen when a team quits. I don't see a quitter in the bunch except the hawks and I think they'll win a game.
It can be . . . but there's a definite sense that the Celtics/Hawks series is a foregone conclusion.