Roe vs Wade Overturned

[ClearwaterVol]

Yes it does. For 2002, you can claim a full-year's deduction for a baby that is born at 11:59pm on December 31, 2022. That means that you have received a deduction in 2022 for an unborn child.

And if it’s born one minute later?

 

[Orangeburst]

Not until it’s born

I already stated the nuance...but keep chasing

 

[Orangeburst]

And if it’s born one minute later?

What does that have to do with the discussion about unborn being dependents? They are born then.

 

[K-town Vol Fan]

Yes it does. For 2002, you can claim a full-year's deduction for a baby that is born at 11:59pm on December 31, 2022. That means that you have received a deduction in 2022 for an unborn child.

Meaning they can't claim it until its born.

 

[ClearwaterVol]

What does that have to do with the discussion about unborn being dependents? They are born then.

Then you cannot claim an unborn as a dependent

 

[Orangeburst]

Then you cannot claim an unborn as a dependent

Like I said..all nuanced, Then why does one get to claim a unborn as a dependent for a full calendar year when only the birth happens within 1 minute of the next year?
You want to say that there is no deductions for that? Make it prorated then.

 

[TRUEFANVol]

Like I said..all nuanced, Then why does one get to claim a unborn as a dependent for a full calendar year when only the birth happens within 1 minute of the next year?
You want to say that there is no deductions for that? Make it prorated then.

The kid was born in 22 so there's a deduction for 22. There's no deduction for unborn babies. The government does not consider the unborn a person. If the baby is born in any part of a year, a deduction can he made for that year

 

[BigOrangeMojo]

Then why can't pregnant women claim unborn babies as dependents?

How about this one. Can a woman that's 30 weeks pregnant get a ticket for driving alone in a HOV lane in Tennessee?

 

[OHvol40]

The kid was born in 22 so there's a deduction for 22. There's no deduction for unborn babies. The government does not consider the unborn a person. If the baby is born in any part of a year, a deduction can he made for that year

If we’re looking at it practically, the expenses don’t automatically go from zero to maximum the second a baby is born. Pregnancy has expenses, people prepare ahead of the birth…

 

[K-town Vol Fan]

people prepare ahead of the birth…

I wonder what percentage are able to do so? You are assuming everyone is willing and able, not the case. Some people have kids just to collect the check and sit at home all year..

 

[Orangeburst]

The kid was born in 22 so there's a deduction for 22. There's no deduction for unborn babies. The government does not consider the unborn a person. If the baby is born in any part of a year, a deduction can he made for that year

Prorate then...otherwise the woman gets Child Credits for the full year in which she was just pregnant.

 

[Orangeburst]

I wonder what percentage are able to do so? You are assuming everyone is willing and able, not the case. Some people have kids just to collect the check and sit at home all year..

You done gave that money away to Ukraine.

Face it..this Social Welfare State has been operational for 60 years with trillions of funding..and the results are about as one see with the War on Drugs.

 

[C-south]

Then why can't pregnant women claim unborn babies as dependents?

Nobody should be able to claim anybody.

 

[BigOrangeMojo]

Prorate then...otherwise the woman gets Child Credits for the full year in which she was just pregnant.

Need SSN for Child Tax Credit and must have live birth to get SSN. You can use HSAs and FSAs for tax efficient pregnancy medical expenses..

 

[TRUEFANVol]

Prorate then...otherwise the woman gets Child Credits for the full year in which she was just pregnant.

I don't have a problem with them getting the credit for the full year

 

[C-south]

I don't have a problem with them getting the credit for the full year

Of course you don’t. 😂 Never understood on why we reward those that place the greatest burden on the system. Just another form of welfare.

 

[Vol8188]

Meaning they can't claim it until its born.

They’re claiming an entire year’s worth for a child that was only alive 1 minute in that year.

But let’s be honest, regardless of the answer here would it change anything for you? If you could claim the child either way, would it change your opinion?

 

[Vol8188]

Then why can't pregnant women claim unborn babies as dependents?

Inability to claim them on your taxes doesn’t make them any less alive. Unless you consider the tax code to be part of the definition of alive.

 

[OHvol40]

I wonder what percentage are able to do so? You are assuming everyone is willing and able, not the case. Some people have kids just to collect the check and sit at home all year..

Well, I’d say a huge percentage prepare to varying degrees and within their means. Very few people bring a baby home to no wardrobe, no diapers, no way to feed them, no bedding situation, no entertainment, ect.

 

[BigOrangeMojo]

Yes, you get a child tax credit for a kid born on 12/31 at 11:59. You also won't get a child tax credit for the year in which the kid is 17 for 364 days, 23 hours and 59 minutes...

 

[Orangeburst]

Yes, you get a child tax credit for a kid born on 12/31 at 11:59. You also won't get a child tax credit for the year in which the kid is 17 for 364 days, 23 hours and 59 minutes...

Not if in school

 

[volfanhill]

I don't care how you feel about the ruling, this is 100% the right call, by the university.

Justice Clarence Thomas won't be fired from George Washington University despite student outrage

 

[Orangeburst]

You abortion supporters sure are racist

 

[BigOrangeMojo]

Not if in school

You cam claim them as a dependent if 18 and student. They would NOT be eligible for Child Tax Credit.

 

[BigOrangeTrain]

This the type of scum you pro abortion people are supporting. Give yourselves a pat on the back.