Rivals Camp Series ‏@RivalsCamp 2m
Full schedule: 2014 Updated Rankings: 12/2 - #Rivals100; 12/3 - #Rivals250; 12/3 - 4-stars outside #Rivals250; 12/4 - Positional Rankings
Thanks for explaining the obvious part for us.Mathematically, you are, of course, correct. I believe, however, that Rivals uses the top 20 only for the purposes of calculating total points for each class, which is 2602 in our case. That 3.56 figure must be predicated upon an average of all 33 commitments.
Ok guys, I am slightly confused.
I have been trying to keep up as best I can with our recruiting. My question, is about the rankings, specifically Rivals, because that is the site I have warmed to. The rankings currently show Alabama #1 with 23 commits, and three 5 stars, while we are #2 with 34 commits and 2 5 stars.
My question is why we are number two? We have more commits. Is it because Bama haven't had many of their class commit and that includes more 5 star players than us? So effectively it is like a team being higher in the standings because it hasn't played as many games?
Thanks.
look at the post above yours
Unfortunately that doesn't mean anything to me... Forgive my lack of knowledge.
This. They only count the highest rated 20 commits. Even tho we have 30+ they only count our highest rated 20.
Also, with Rivals you're better off looking at their numerical ranking as opposed to the stars. Each recruit is broken down as a 5.7/5.8/5.9 etc. So two recruits could both be 4 stars but one would receive more points for being a 6.0 as opposed to a 5.9. They also used to give bonus points for players ranked in the top100/250 and players rated at the top of their position rankings. Not sure if this is still the case tho.
