I was baptized just not up to your standards. It may not say specifically that being sprinkled is ok but it doesn't say it's not an acceptable form either. You are missing the whole point of baptism getting caught up on procedure. With all due respect imo that's as bad as not getting baptized. I find it very hard to believe when I meet my maker he says "InVOLuntary, you've done the best that I could have expected of you but I'm sorry, you're going to have to spend the rest of eternity in hell because you were sprinkled. I know that when you were baptized, your heart was where it needed to be but we have strict rules here. Sorry but, bye".
This is precisely why you see churches moving from denominational affiliation. It's a concerning and presumptuous way to teach Jesus. And, I say that as a Methodist which has more "methods" than about any church.
We are in agreement on this. I have been at the same Methodist Church for 32 years- from a very young child to now my children. These are things that people are going to disagree about, and I have no problem with that. I think there are many reasons why churches sprinkle for baptism, and one is that it is practical. Even though I wasn't baptized as an infant, another is infant baptism. I have chosen to baptize all 3 of my kids as infants, and they won't be submerged. To me, it is just different methods of reaching the same goal. I feel like this is deja vu because it seems like these things have been discussed.
