Just posted a small portion of this in the FF, but wanted to share with you all as well:
IMO its really embarrassing that state schools with agriculture programs/majors/departments can't maintain a grass football field. For example, Kentucky, You're the "Bluegrass" state for crying out loud, yet you play on turf!!
If you look around the Big Ten Conference, nearly all of their schools have gone to turf fields. Some of those (Iowa, Ohio State, Nebraska, etc.) are some of the most agriculture rich and driven states in the country. In the SEC, you mean to tell me you can't grow grass in Missouri and at Ole Miss!?
The game should be played outdoors, and on grass whenever practicable (you're off the hook Syracuse). I'm willing to be somewhat lenient on really cold weather areas where it may be hard to keep grass alive once the calendar turns (Boston College), or in places where it doesn't rain much (Arizona, Nevada, New Mexico). But if you are a mid-western or Southern state school with an agriculture program, you should be embarrassed to have to play on turf.