Recruiting Forum Football Talk III

Status
Not open for further replies.
Same page. Enough coordinators. Get us a “more with less” ball coach who’s up for the challenge.

Had to like the Campbell quote about the steep challenge of turning the ISU program around in relation to his taking that job. Coaches are motivated by different things. Got to find a coach motivated by the adversity.
 
Tn losing to Bama by a blocked Cody fieldgoal... closest we've been to besting Saban..loss yes...but dang to be competitive again

Horseshoes and hand grenades. He’s mediocre. Great offensive mind, but a serial job hopper. He’s not going to get a sniff anyway because we have a competent AD that probably doesn’t read message boards.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sleegro
Something to consider when evaluating coaches: it's not just about the record, but about how the record was made. Even for good coaches, improvement isn't always linear as reflected in the overall record (ie, 6-6, 9-4, 11-1, etc.). If we look at how many close games the team played, the record against ranked opponents, and the number of blowouts (wins and losses), that should take some of the noise/luck factor out of records.

For example, let's compare the best individual seasons for three head coaching candidates that have been discussed here:
  • Coach A: overall record 10-2
    • against ranked opponents: 1-1
    • in one possession games: 3-1
    • wins by more than two touchdowns: 6
    • losses by more than two touchdowns: 1
  • Coach B: overall record 9-3
    • against ranked opponents: 3-1
    • in one possession games: 4-2
    • wins by more than two touchdowns: 5
    • losses by more than two touchdowns: 1
  • Coach C: overall record 10-4
    • against ranked opponents: 5-2
    • in one possession games: 7-3
    • wins by more than two touchdowns: 2
    • losses by more than two touchdowns: 0
Coach A blew out half of his opponents and only played four close games, winning three.
Coach B played more close games, probably because he played four ranked opponents to Coach A's two, but he blew out his remaining opponents.
Coach C played almost every game on his schedule within one possession. He played ton of ranked opponents, but played even his other opponents close, going 7-3.

Let's assume for the sake of argument that winning close games is replicable skill, instead of luck. Do we prefer playing close games or blowing out opponents? I would think that by year 3 or 4, we want to be blowing out lesser opponents like Vandy, South Carolina, and Mizzou.

If you go through coaching records game by game, I think it's easier to distinguish the mirages (Coach C, aka Tom Herman) from the actual program builders (Coach B, aka Matt Campbell and Coach A, aka Lane Kiffin).

View attachment 342946View attachment 342947View attachment 343068
Solid analysis
 
giphy.gif
That guy was relentless with trolling that Pruitt was going nowhere.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

VN Store



Back
Top