Recruiting Football Talk VII

Status
Not open for further replies.
AP: I’m gonna go yes and depends on Seaton

To me that reads like we will have a Top 10 class without Seaton...

and/or we're going to land him...

so that's interesting
I don’t see it if we miss on bates, smith, Mikel, and seaton. Who else are we favored for that puts us up in the rankings? Really want us to hit on some of those after some misses on top guys before the season started.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigSteve09
It's not hyperbole, next year will be year 4. If you look at the trajectory of this defense, it won't be any better. It actually could be worse given the attrition. So I'm asking, is year 5 the breakout year? Or should we wait for year 6 or 7?

I've been here a long time. These conversations are about as predictable as the seasons. It's always the same, "wait till he gets his guys in here. " meanwhile, 3 years in, in a time when rebuilding has never been easier, and we have a defense that couldn't cover mother Theresa. But there's always next year, or the year after, or the year after that. Meanwhile, recruiting suffers because people see that you can't field a competent defense, and we have the excuse that we need more players but we can't get them because we suck at playing defense.

Tim Banks will never field a defense capable of winning anything of significance.
Yeah. Pruitt won 11 and an Orange Bowl so do Dooley and Butch. It’s all been the same. 3 winning seasons and bowls in a row. Highest recruit rate average. Nothing different all all. Speaks like an inbred. Always saying al aight. Nothing different.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Advertisement



Back
Top