So you don’t get the recruiting forum in Houston?So, dont get alot of the same VOL coverage here in Houston as back home and I'm sure there is a good reason, but I was wondering why we recruited Crouch only to (MAYBE) move him from RB to LB? I get we need LB"s but why take a great running back (reminds me sort of of Derrick Henry type), recruit the heck out of him and move him to a alternate position? I know its been done before but this guy looks like a legit RB to me.
An excellent point. Historically, most running backs lose effectiveness after age 30. With a 3-4 year rookie contract at lower than actual value, running backs usually only get one real shot at the money around 25-26 years old. That's a big reason Le'Veon Bell is holding out this season even though he was offered 14 million per or whatever it was. You can probably extend a career, with some luck, at least another whole long term contract at linebacker.Simple, as a football player would you rather be the hammer or the nail? The longevity of LB's in the NFL is a lot higher than it is for RB's.
I believe it's a longevity issue, he's thinking about his N.F.L future.So, dont get alot of the same VOL coverage here in Houston as back home and I'm sure there is a good reason, but I was wondering why we recruited Crouch only to (MAYBE) move him from RB to LB? I get we need LB"s but why take a great running back (reminds me sort of of Derrick Henry type), recruit the heck out of him and move him to a alternate position? I know its been done before but this guy looks like a legit RB to me.
what kind of injuries did he have? Did they require surgery?
It's very common for high school RBs to switch to LB in college, as long as the kid has the right body type and physical attributes to make the switch. It happens all the time. If he wants to play LB and he has the ability, we'd be crazy to pass on him.
The reason he came to Tennessee is that we promised to exclusively use him at LB. Clemson wanted him at RB and that is why he cooled on them. He would not be at Tennessee if we recruited him at RB. And when you have an opportunity to snag a player as talented as QC, you do it, and let him play LB. He will be a huge asset at LB.
It’s the right choiceSo, dont get alot of the same VOL coverage here in Houston as back home and I'm sure there is a good reason, but I was wondering why we recruited Crouch only to (MAYBE) move him from RB to LB? I get we need LB"s but why take a great running back (reminds me sort of of Derrick Henry type), recruit the heck out of him and move him to a alternate position? I know its been done before but this guy looks like a legit RB to me.