Put Banks at running back!!

#26
#26
Banks is really bad at either position. I get tired of watching him out of position and getting torched in coverage. I really don’t get the high praise I see for him from people.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wesley21
#27
#27
We have a 6'6 freshman RB on the bench. Had a good scrimmage last week.

I'm sure Jeremy saw him spill his chocolate milk in the lunchroom and decided he didn't have time to waste developing an impressive back with good hands and speed.
That guy sounds like a much needed Tight End.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ShoalCreekVol
#28
#28
He's got heart. we do need a big back tho. Gray is a star but not a guy who will make the defense regret having to tackle him.
 
#29
#29
We need a big back that can break tackles!!!
Running back isn’t the issue. And WR may not be the issue either if we had a QB that could throw the ball consistently. Teams will stack the box and make it harder on our OLine to run block till we can prove we have a QB that can throw the ball consistently. Once we are able to throw the ball down the field and open up some things then it won’t matter who’s running the ball.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jarnol32
#30
#30
I would just assume to put Crouch at RB as Banks. Crouch was a very good RB in high school and he has the build to take/deliver the punishment needed, especially in short yard situations.
 
  • Like
Reactions: coachballcoach
#36
#36
I think Gray is a star in the making. Wouldn’t be surprised if we only have him one more season. His is the type back the NFL is fond of right now. Thinking he will be as good as Kamara.

Yes but we need a bigger back to complement and Gray would be even more dangerous
 
#38
#38
Crouch would be the one I'd like to see. He's probably the best back on the team...he did have something like 11 tackles on Sat, so maybe the light starting to come on for him on D.

The camera was on him at one point and I was a little surprised how jacked he is... that guy could lay some serious licks on the RB's. Excited to see him progress.
 
#44
#44
Forget banks. Put Crouch there, he would be a beast there rather than being a mediocre linebacker.
 
#45
#45
When deciding whether Banks would be best on offense or defense, the coaches have to make a decision:

Would you rather have stupid undisciplined penalties, or stupid undisciplined penalties AND fumbles.

Coaching is hard.
 
#48
#48
Thinking about Banks or Crouch is exactly the obvious creativity any coach should be considering to mix things up. I wish any of you were coaching Or had JPs ear bc unfortunately I don’t see JP doing anything non-vanilla
 
#49
#49
This is hilarious, but then again I'm drunk as hell.
Me too Bro. Most of the time im on here with all of my Brothers in Volnation. I wanna win and I want it bad. Like all my other Brothers on Volnation. Can I get a Hell ye Bro?
 
#50
#50
Put him at Leading Fullback. He will put a hat on somebody. We run the I with him leading our Backs in the whole. We will dive up front with him. He is no LB he can't cover in space against the pass nor can Q. Crouch #27. Our defense has no covered in short yardage
 
Advertisement



Back
Top