FLVOL_79
GS-16 Classified
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2011
- Messages
- 48,132
- Likes
- 71,535
Drew Richmond? Worsedo you think KylePhillips is better/worse/the same today vs. the beginning of the year or at any point last year?
Drew Richmond? Worse
Alexis Johnson? Better
Micah Abernathy?
Nigel Warrior? Same
Baylen Buchannon?
darryl Taylor? Same ( auburn was great)
JG? Better
Callaway? Better
all i'm saying is that the results are what they are, and we generally know why we're getting them.
as to "performance", i think you can make a strong argument that performance has gotten better.
it has not gotten good enough overall to account for, or make up for, some of the overall issues we seem to experience....ie, those things you mentioned above, run defense last week, penalties, depth etc....
but there are things happening that do pass the eye test imo.
Gotcha....and I think Drew Richmonda, at this point this season, is having his best season at UT.I misread your original post. I am comparing this year so far to last year total.
Iyo, is DR ahead of last year or about the same overall?
Also LBs and DL are worse as units compared to last year?
We are No. 14 in the 247 composite team rankings for the 2019 recruiting class. That is good for 6th in the SEC, about where we have averaged in the recruiting rankings for the last decade. Development is the key.
i think the evaluation process for this staff is a lot different than the last one. that combined with what looks like a staff that should develop pretty well, should bode well for the future. this staff recruits a different type of player than the last staff did. i think the last staff got too hung up on the recruiting rankings to some degree. this staff doesn't care. you either fit and they want you, or htey don't. that's why you saw them not really push for some of the in state kids that many here wanted, just becuasse they were were a 4* TN kid. that's what hte last staff did.We are No. 14 in the 247 composite team rankings for the 2019 recruiting class. That is good for 6th in the SEC, about where we have averaged in the recruiting rankings for the last decade. Development is the key.
I could substitute “Kiffen” or “Dooley” or “Butch” for Pruitt and it would describe the program for the past decade
Always the dog chasing its tail.
Until we find a coach that can develop players on the field, we are going to continue to be talking about next year.
Yes, another key point is that Pruitt is recruiting to power football and trench warfare. Butch recruited to finesse. That matters because SEC is a power football league.i think the evaluation process for this staff is a lot different than the last one. that combined with what looks like a staff that should develop pretty well, should bode well for the future. this staff recruits a different type of player than the last staff did. i think the last staff got too hung up on the recruiting rankings to some degree. this staff doesn't care. you either fit and they want you, or htey don't. that's why you saw them not really push for some of the in state kids that many here wanted, just becuasse they were were a 4* TN kid. that's what hte last staff did.
nah, i get it now.
the excuse making at this point i think is moot. i haven't seen anything posted by a fan here that's so far out of line, at least as it pertains to an actual situation needed to be dealt with by the staff. we don't have enough depth on the LOS, we are young in the secondary, the O line isn't great, the schedule has been really hard, it is year one, and all the things that come along with a "year one"....etc, etc, etc....
the only way those become excuses is if they are used to explain how/why we lost a game. it may explain how a season turns out...all those things cumulatively do have an affect, and then become things that need to be fixed, either as the season goes along, or as your program moves on in it's development.
but as to specifically why we lost a game? it's usually something more tangible........
yep....i thnk guys like phillips and Johnson have both seen a lot of improvment since last year.
i think you can look at Richmond specifically on the O line and see that he's gotten better in just the last month. the interior of the line is a work in progress, but i'd tell you aside from the penalties they committed (which is part of their development imo), phyically they played pretty darn well last Saturday night....maybe their best game physically.
the CB's, well, they're freshmen. i think we all see the potential taylor and thompson have. they've both flashed several times this season, and they've both made the type of mistakes most of us thought they would make being freshmen.
JG is a lot better than he was last year. he's still got some issues. but he's made significant progress relative to what happened last year.
AGree about the WR group. i think getting Jennings back, and seeing him improve as well, has really helped the whole group out.
and i'm sure the coaches could point out more good and bad than we can. but i do think if you can see these types of things, then you kinda have to take Pruitt at his word that we just don't have enought guys making the gains some guys like these have.
if we did, we'd probably see some different results. so until we get more guys on the same page, at hte same effort and performance level, the same accountability level, the results will be mixed....kinda like they have been this year.