85SugarVol
I prefer the tumult of Liberty
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2010
- Messages
- 34,853
- Likes
- 69,576
Fair enough. That could be it.....Didn't ask me but, comments from someone protecting her family.
Fair enough. That could be it.....
...or it could be that she is actually disgusted by the:
grotesque lies,
constantly distorted and manipulated,
grossly misinterpret,
false accusations that defame my character and those of the people I love
I found it interesting that she described her entries as stream-of-consciousness thoughts (which is the exact terminology I was using btw). For those of you who do not understand the significance - look it up.
Probably protecting herself and her family.@McDad I felt I owed you one.
What do you make of Ashley's comments to the judge?
āThe point of the theft, I assume, was to be able to peddle grotesque lies by distorting my stream-of-consciousness thoughts,ā
āThe defendantās actions have created a constant environment of anxiety, fear, and intimidation in which my innermost thoughts are constantly distorted and manipulated.ā
āRepeatedly, I hear others grossly misinterpret my once-private writings and lob false accusations that defame my character and those of the people I love.ā
Then she could have addressed those specific passages but chose not to..and to speak in general..because to denie what's written as what's it being interpreted as would set back any progress in recovery she has made.I don't know. Maybe looking at what Ashley wrote to the judge can give some perspective.
āThe point of the theft, I assume, was to be able to peddle grotesque lies by distorting my stream-of-consciousness thoughts,ā
āThe defendantās actions have created a constant environment of anxiety, fear, and intimidation in which my innermost thoughts are constantly distorted and manipulated.ā
āRepeatedly, I hear others grossly misinterpret my once-private writings and lob false accusations that defame my character and those of the people I love.ā
In light of that, I'm more solid in my stance than ever.
She is 100% denying what it is being interpreted as.....and she clearly spoke to what is hindering her recovery process.Then she could have addressed those specific passages but chose not to..and to speak in general..because to denie what's written as what's it being interpreted as would set back any progress in recovery she has made.
It a common technique taught to people using ketamine therapy to help heal past trauma..if you read the rest of her diary it's clearly she is a disturb and traumatized women.
How far? Apparently all new levels of self delusion youāve reached.To think that a mere 3 days ago you guys completely and conveniently overlooked the word "probably".
The mindless on here were posting as if Biden was guilty of some sort of inappropriate behavior.
Now look at us......how far we have come.
You're welcome.
Sometimes I believe you can not only lead a horse to water, but.................................
Sheās in damage control. Nothing more, nothing less.She is 100% denying what it is being interpreted as.....and she clearly spoke to what is hindering her recovery process.
I was clear, just because someone says "probably" in no way means the event is probable.
That has nothing to do with redefining the word, it has everything to do with the context of its usage.
Total nonsense.Sheās in damage control. Nothing more, nothing less.
Defending herself and her family. Which is fine.
She never intended her open, honest, and vulnerable thoughts to be known.
Thatās why her actual diary entries are more believable than the spin.
Read what I said: āI read several pages of you clearly interpreting āprobably inappropriateā and āprobably not inappropriateā.
You failed to apply the definition in the correct context.ā
You absolutely did this.
Talk about moving the goal post. That may be a record.Your interpretation of āprobably inappropriateā was āprobably not inappropriateā - Iām not inferring this or making it up. You said it. They are your own words.
Probably - adverb. in all likelihood; very likely
Yes. It is shocking that in the middle of her father's presidential campaign she has chosen to downplay her own allegations of her father's inappropriate showers with her as a pre-teen.Talk about moving the goal post. That may be a record.
I denied the bolded. It had ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with me failing to apply the definition in the correct contest.
That is patently absurd.
I said in my very first post that I took her "probably not appropriate" comment as a sign that there probably was nothing inappropriate. NOTHING to do with definition and everything to do with context. JESH
And her letter to the judge completely supports my position.
I think I'm caught up now. I didn't see any other references to anything else in the letter Ashley wrote to the judge.By telling the truth?
Or is she now lying?