President Donald Trump - J.D. Vance Administration

[LSU-SIU]

What matters to you, doesn't matter to me.

Yes it does.

 

[Majors]

Harris was not my candidate, and yes Trump is a con.

That’s accurate, you were told she’s your candidate.

 

[BowlBrother85]

So you are saying Leftist Activists Judges are making their decisions because it’s Trump and that’s why the Supreme Court is needed. Check

That's the standard, lazy narrative whenever the judiciary strikes down a frivolous Trump lawsuit or Unconstitutional executive order, but in many cases, it doesn't hold water.

 

[appvol]

That's the standard, lazy narrative whenever the judiciary strikes down a frivolous Trump lawsuit or Unconstitutional executive order, but in many cases, it doesn't hold water.

And your crying because the Supreme Court has a say on these decisions

 

[appvol]

That's the standard, lazy narrative whenever the judiciary strikes down a frivolous Trump lawsuit or Unconstitutional executive order, but in many cases, it doesn't hold water.

And a lot these Leftists Judges decisions have already been overturned because of their overreach. The Democrat playbook is lawfare this time with Trump.

 

[FLVOL_79]

So what do you attribute to her major turnaround in now supporting what Trump is doing after vehemently opposing it?

$$. Taxpayer money flooding in. Hotels. Bars. Restaurants. Gardeners Soldiers gotta eat! $375 a day per diem for each troop on top of their normal active duty pay.

Lets not forget how many millions of tax payer dollars this is costing. Residents of DC getting that hypothetically "free meal".

 

[BowlBrother85]

And a lot these Leftists Judges decisions have already been overturned because the f their overreach. The Democrat playbook is lawfare this time with Trump.

Trump's playbook has always been to politicize everything, and then play the victim card, whenever his agenda hits a snag.

 

[MontyPython]

You could. But threads on legal stuff and court rulings typically play out over the long term. Adn by the time the appeal/overturn/upheld ruling hits most people have lost interest and moved on.

An example is the NYDA case against trump.

You and your reasonable logic. Damn your oily hide!

 

[MontyPython]

So you are saying Leftist Activists Judges are making their decisions because it’s Trump and that’s why the Supreme Court is needed. Check

I am sorry that you don't understand what's called the "Rule of Law". This is what the judicial branch upholds and this is what Donald Trump despises.

Trump is going to get his nuts clipped off over the next several Supreme Court decisions. I'm willing to wager whatever you like on this.

Enjoy!

Edit: This just in...

Harvard wins landmark victory over Trump administration

The problem with Trump is he's just too stupid to even try to dress things up with a legitimate reason for doing what he's doing. Instead he just charges through like a bull in a china shop which I guess explains the whole billionaire is better than you attitude which permeates throughout his being. You're just too blind to recognize this truism.

“A review of the administrative record makes it difficult to conclude anything other than that defendants used antisemitism as a smokescreen for a targeted, ideologically-motivated assault on this country’s premier universities,” wrote Burroughs, an appointee of former President Barack Obama.

“Their actions have jeopardized decades of research and the welfare of all those who could stand to benefit from that research, as well as reflect a disregard for the rights protected by the Constitution and federal statutes,” Burroughs added.

 

[BowlBrother85]

Under Donald Trump's presidency, we are not the United States. We are Red States and Blue States, and that appears to be exactly how he wants it. Trump loves the division.

 

[Redleg68]

Under Donald Trump's presidency, we are not the United States. We are Red States and Blue States, and that appears to be exactly how he wants it. Trump loves the division.

What rock have you been hiding under? It has been that way for the past fifty years.

 

[McDad]

You and your reasonable logic. Damn your oily hide!

Oily hide????

 

[BowlBrother85]

What rock have you been hiding under? It has been that way for the past fifty years.

Not true.

 

[hog88]

Under Donald Trump's presidency, we are not the United States. We are Red States and Blue States, and that appears to be exactly how he wants it. Trump loves the division.

Dude, that started in 2009.

 

[appvol]

I am sorry that you don't understand what's called the "Rule of Law". This is what the judicial branch upholds and this is what Donald Trump despises.

Trump is going to get his nuts clipped off over the next several Supreme Court decisions. I'm willing to wager whatever you like on this.

Enjoy!

Edit: This just in...

Harvard wins landmark victory over Trump administration

The problem with Trump is he's just too stupid to even try to dress things up with a legitimate reason for doing what he's doing. Instead he just charges through like a bull in a china shop which I guess explains the whole billionaire is better than you attitude which permeates throughout his being. You're just too blind to recognize this truism.

“A review of the administrative record makes it difficult to conclude anything other than that defendants used antisemitism as a smokescreen for a targeted, ideologically-motivated assault on this country’s premier universities,” wrote Burroughs, an appointee of former President Barack Obama.

“Their actions have jeopardized decades of research and the welfare of all those who could stand to benefit from that research, as well as reflect a disregard for the rights protected by the Constitution and federal statutes,” Burroughs added.

So a Obama appointed Judge made the ruling.

• Likely Appeal:
  The ruling is expected to be appealed by the government, suggesting the legal battle over Harvard's federal funding is not yet over.

 

[appvol]

Not true.

Obama made the country Red States and Blue States

 

[Majors]

Under Donald Trump's presidency, we are not the United States. We are Red States and Blue States, and that appears to be exactly how he wants it. Trump loves the division.

Showing your derangement.

 

[MontyPython]

Dude, that started in 2009.

Wait... What about your buddy Lincoln?

 

[MontyPython]

Showing your derangement.

Showing your ignorance.

Yes, former President Donald Trump has referred to individual states as "blue states" and "red states" in various contexts, particularly during his campaigns and presidency. The terms "red state" and "blue state" are widely used in U.S. politics to denote states that predominantly vote for the Republican Party (red) or the Democratic Party (blue) in presidential and other elections. Trump’s usage of these terms often aligns with this common political shorthand to describe the partisan leanings of states.

For example, during a 2020 press conference, Trump explicitly referenced "blue states" when discussing the COVID-19 pandemic, suggesting that the death toll from the virus was lower if you excluded blue states, implying a partisan divide in how the pandemic was managed or perceived. He stated, “If you take the blue states out, we’re at a level that I don’t think anybody in the world would be at. We’re really at a very low level.” This comment framed blue states as distinct from red states in terms of outcomes or governance.[](https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/17/us/politics/trump-america.html)

Additionally, Trump’s rhetoric often highlights divisions between red and blue states when discussing policy, federal funding, or electoral strategy. In 2025, reports noted that Trump’s executive actions, such as targeting blue states like New York, Vermont, and California for their climate policies or threatening to cut federal funds to states with certain social policies, further indicate his use of the red-blue framework to differentiate state-level political alignments.[](https://www.cnn.com/2025/02/28/politics/trump-red-state-social-agenda)[](https://news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/trump-discriminating-against-blue-states-sets-up-historic-crisis)

Trump’s campaign strategies also reflect this terminology. In the final days of the 2024 presidential campaign, he made a point to visit traditionally blue states like Virginia and New Mexico, with his campaign framing these visits as an attempt to “expand the map” by challenging Democratic strongholds. This suggests he was consciously engaging with the red-blue state paradigm to describe his electoral ambitions.[](https://www.npr.org/2024/11/03/nx-s1-5175599/trump-is-choosing-to-campaign-in-blue-states-will-the-risk-pay-off)

While Trump does not always use the exact phrases "red state" or "blue state" in every speech or statement, his references to states in partisan terms—such as criticizing “Democrat-run cities” or praising states that supported him—implicitly align with the red-blue terminology popularized since the 2000 election. His actions, such as threatening to withhold federal funding from blue states or prioritizing policies that resonate with red states, further demonstrate his acknowledgment of this divide.[](https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/17/us/politics/trump-america.html)[](https://www.cnn.com/2025/02/28/politics/trump-red-state-social-agenda)

In summary, Trump has used the terms "blue states" and "red states" directly and indirectly to describe the political landscape, especially when discussing electoral outcomes, policy disputes, or governance differences, as evidenced by his public statements and reported actions.[](https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/17/us/politics/trump-america.html)[](https://news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/trump-discriminating-against-blue-states-sets-up-historic-crisis)[](https://www.npr.org/2024/11/03/nx-s1-5175599/trump-is-choosing-to-campaign-in-blue-states-will-the-risk-pay-off)

 

[hog88]

Wait... What about your buddy Lincoln?

He set the stage for sh!t show that’s been going on for over a hundred years.

 

[Majors]

Showing your ignorance.

Yes, former President Donald Trump has referred to individual states as "blue states" and "red states" in various contexts, particularly during his campaigns and presidency. The terms "red state" and "blue state" are widely used in U.S. politics to denote states that predominantly vote for the Republican Party (red) or the Democratic Party (blue) in presidential and other elections. Trump’s usage of these terms often aligns with this common political shorthand to describe the partisan leanings of states.

For example, during a 2020 press conference, Trump explicitly referenced "blue states" when discussing the COVID-19 pandemic, suggesting that the death toll from the virus was lower if you excluded blue states, implying a partisan divide in how the pandemic was managed or perceived. He stated, “If you take the blue states out, we’re at a level that I don’t think anybody in the world would be at. We’re really at a very low level.” This comment framed blue states as distinct from red states in terms of outcomes or governance.[](https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/17/us/politics/trump-america.html)

Additionally, Trump’s rhetoric often highlights divisions between red and blue states when discussing policy, federal funding, or electoral strategy. In 2025, reports noted that Trump’s executive actions, such as targeting blue states like New York, Vermont, and California for their climate policies or threatening to cut federal funds to states with certain social policies, further indicate his use of the red-blue framework to differentiate state-level political alignments.[](https://www.cnn.com/2025/02/28/politics/trump-red-state-social-agenda)[](https://news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/trump-discriminating-against-blue-states-sets-up-historic-crisis)

Trump’s campaign strategies also reflect this terminology. In the final days of the 2024 presidential campaign, he made a point to visit traditionally blue states like Virginia and New Mexico, with his campaign framing these visits as an attempt to “expand the map” by challenging Democratic strongholds. This suggests he was consciously engaging with the red-blue state paradigm to describe his electoral ambitions.[](https://www.npr.org/2024/11/03/nx-s1-5175599/trump-is-choosing-to-campaign-in-blue-states-will-the-risk-pay-off)

While Trump does not always use the exact phrases "red state" or "blue state" in every speech or statement, his references to states in partisan terms—such as criticizing “Democrat-run cities” or praising states that supported him—implicitly align with the red-blue terminology popularized since the 2000 election. His actions, such as threatening to withhold federal funding from blue states or prioritizing policies that resonate with red states, further demonstrate his acknowledgment of this divide.[](https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/17/us/politics/trump-america.html)[](https://www.cnn.com/2025/02/28/politics/trump-red-state-social-agenda)

In summary, Trump has used the terms "blue states" and "red states" directly and indirectly to describe the political landscape, especially when discussing electoral outcomes, policy disputes, or governance differences, as evidenced by his public statements and reported actions.[](https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/17/us/politics/trump-america.html)[](https://news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/trump-discriminating-against-blue-states-sets-up-historic-crisis)[](https://www.npr.org/2024/11/03/nx-s1-5175599/trump-is-choosing-to-campaign-in-blue-states-will-the-risk-pay-off)

That’s great, the states have been divided before he said anything you just quick clicked. But you’re sweet for all the post from NYT, NPR etc.

 

[Redleg68]

Not true.

The Origins of Red and Blue States - Electoral Vote Map​

NBC and CBS used blue for Republican wins and red for Democratic states in the 1976 presidential election between Jimmy Carter and Gerald Ford. ABC News opted to use yellow for Republicans, blue for Democrats, and red for states …

 

[appvol]

I am sorry that you don't understand what's called the "Rule of Law". This is what the judicial branch upholds and this is what Donald Trump despises.

Trump is going to get his nuts clipped off over the next several Supreme Court decisions. I'm willing to wager whatever you like on this.

Enjoy!

Edit: This just in...

Harvard wins landmark victory over Trump administration

The problem with Trump is he's just too stupid to even try to dress things up with a legitimate reason for doing what he's doing. Instead he just charges through like a bull in a china shop which I guess explains the whole billionaire is better than you attitude which permeates throughout his being. You're just too blind to recognize this truism.

“A review of the administrative record makes it difficult to conclude anything other than that defendants used antisemitism as a smokescreen for a targeted, ideologically-motivated assault on this country’s premier universities,” wrote Burroughs, an appointee of former President Barack Obama.

“Their actions have jeopardized decades of research and the welfare of all those who could stand to benefit from that research, as well as reflect a disregard for the rights protected by the Constitution and federal statutes,” Burroughs added.

Jonathan Turley Says Trump Admin ‘Going To Prevail’ In Legal ‘War Of Attrition’ Against Harvard

George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley predicted that Harvard University would eventually lose its legal battles with the Trump administration Thursday on “Fox and Friends. ” Secretary of Education Linda McMahon announced May 6 that Harvard would not receive future grants...

www.aol.com

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

 

[TN Ribs]

Dude, that started in 2009.

No it didn’t. Not even close to being accurate.