President Donald Trump - J.D. Vance Administration

#39,053
#39,053
DinkinFlicka said:
We aren't talking about grammar here. I'm just trying to clarify your message because you're claiming one thing while backing it up with sentiments that directly oppose it.

Are you contradictory, or just stupid?
Click to expand...
I don’t care I forgot the n’t because you knew what I meant when I said I could care less even if it’s wrong. So I guess I’m just stupid

AI
"Could care less" is a very common usage in American English, so much so that it's often understood to mean "couldn't care less" despite the logical inconsistency
 
Last edited:
#39,056
#39,056
BeardedVol said:
You know you have a strong position when your response is "but what about Obama?"
Click to expand...
My strong position is that this is not a high crime or misdemeanor. Something a rational person would agree has no business being discussed. So me calling out another posters hypocrisy by calling for trumps removal for office over this isn't a concern bc his position is wrong and hypocritical.

Track records matter. I'm sure you can point to all of your posts condemning Obama for his unlawful act. Please share. Or are you just a blustering massive fraud? Can't wait to see your posts from back in the day. Or maybe at one point in time you were good with the executive branch determining the guilt of citizens. Oh wait.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vol since 77, NorthDallas40, hog88 and 3 others
#39,057
#39,057
volfanhill said:
My strong position is that this is not a high crime or misdemeanor. Something a rational person would agree has no business being discussed. So me calling out another posters hypocrisy by calling for trumps removal for office over this isn't a concern bc his position is wrong and hypocritical.

Track records matter. I'm sure you can point to all of your posts condemning Obama for his unlawful act. Please share. Or are you just a blustering massive fraud? Can't wait to see your posts from back in the day. Or maybe at one point in time you were good with the executive branch determining the guilt of citizens. Oh wait.
Click to expand...

Obama's actions are irrelevant to the matter at hand, even more so since the Republican judges on the Supreme Court have declared that Presidents have immunity from criminal prosecution for 'official acts'.

Your continued reference of the drone strike on Anwar al-Awlaki is just a tool you use to dodge discussing a topic that you can't reconcile with your espoused beliefs.
 
#39,061
#39,061
lawgator1 said:
Trump had been convicted and the conviction affirmed on appeal.

Cook is being fired on an accusation.

By any reasonable standard, Trump must immediately be removed from office for cause.
Click to expand...
This has destroyed the careers of many males over the last 40ish years.

Equal rights bro, equal rights.

All joking aside, people get fired for accusations all the time. I'd be more worried about criminal implications based on accusations only..
 
#39,062
#39,062
Why won‘t the leaders of Chicago do what it takes to fix this problem? They won’t because they are laundering the money elsewhere where and it takes hard work to identify and fix the problem. Dem political leaders are anemic to hard work. they prefer to obstruct and complain.

So I’ll ask the Dems on the board, what should we do? Let this once great city decay away or step in and help the local governemt fix the problem. I bet I know what the citizens of Chicago want.

This hurts the disenfranchised more than anyone. The Dems claim to be the party that looks after minorities yet their actions do not indicate so.

Just on the 4th of July weekend- “At least 55 people shot, 8 fatally, in 4th of July weekend."







 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: W.TN.Orange Blood
#39,064
#39,064
Vol737 said:
If the American flag is fair game, which I deplore, then I would assume any and all forms of flag burning are…as long as it’s not someone else’s private property. I just don’t know how so many people have time to protest and burn shhhhtuff. I know I don’t have that kind of free time.
Click to expand...
But it isn't. That's the thing. If you burn a rainbow flag in public, it will be considered a hate crime. Guaranteed.

You can **** all over the same country that gives you the right to burn their flag, but God forbid you burn the flag that represents mentally disturbed individuals.

And like you I don't have the time. Nor the inclination to spend my own money and set fire to it to make a political statement
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vol737, Buddy’s Bandit and appvol
#39,065
#39,065
lawgator1 said:
Not to be outdone, DeSantis is in an escalating fight with various Florida cities over crosswalks that were painted or chalked multi color. He sent road crews out at 2 am to paint over them, then when locals re-did some of them he sent highway patrol units out to guard them.

Such nonsense. Who the F cares what a cross walk is painted. ???
Click to expand...
definitely not agreeing with DeSantis here, but there is reason to undo some of it.

if its done right, and is just a crosswalk, no issue. but here in atlanta they had to redo one of the intersections because they painted the whole road that way. it was impossible to tell where the lanes were, where you were supposed to stop, where it was safe to walk, where the sidewalk was, where the curb was, etc. the number of accidents and struck pedestrians skyrocketed. of course every time someone was hit for standing in the middle of the rainbow road taking a selfie it was called a hate crime. but eventually they got rid of the rainbow from the main driving parts of the road, which was also called a hate crime, even though it was literally to save lives, especially amongst that community.

there is a reason we only paint our roads with certain colors. adding the rainbow can be dangerous.
 
#39,067
#39,067
DinkinFlicka said:
You know how utter ass this logic is, right?

It's somewhat important to me to know that you know that.
Click to expand...
I agreed with the White House examples. I don’t agree with holding people for small issues such as jumping over the Marta turnstile, speeding, jay walking, tearing the tag off a mattress. The guy attacking people on the subway and throwing his feces and urine on them should not have cashless bail, imo. I know that NorthDallas is able to throw his feces and urine on anyone chooses bc he is rich. That still doesn’t change my opinion.
 
#39,068
#39,068
volbeast33 said:
I agreed with the White House examples. I don’t agree with holding people for small issues such as jumping over the Marta turnstile, speeding, jay walking, tearing the tag off a mattress. The guy attacking people on the subway and throwing his feces and urine on them should not have cashless bail, imo. I know that NorthDallas is able to throw his feces and urine on anyone chooses bc he is rich. That still doesn’t change my opinion.
Click to expand...
LMAO where do I send this month’s rent check for living in your head? BC… you know… I’m rich and all. 🤡
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top