President Donald Trump - J.D. Vance Administration

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

If you think I am a "leftist", your dumbass doesn't know the definition of the term. I get that sort of discourse works for you here in your safe space of a dumbed downed Trump forum. At least that is what it is for you
I've never seen you in any discussion on here where I would describe you as anything other than well left of center, and here you are using the leftist talking points while admitting you haven't seen any details.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vol since 77
I've never seen you in any discussion on here where I would describe you as anything other than well left of center, and here you are using the leftist talking points while admitting you haven't seen any details.
Good for you. Your opinion isn't as credible as you think. You show a propensity for labeling everyone who disagrees with your opinion as a leftist. That works for you a bit in this forum, which is a safe space for your spinless ass
 
I can’t tell you specifically how influential any one person is to any president. Nor can you. I can only tell you it’s pretty widely known that Hunter was highly involved.

You know that, as well. But you’re hiding behind these disingenuous arguments. “What was his official title!”

“Crackhead in chief”
 
That's what I thought. Do you know the number of seniors who fall into the "poor" classification by yearly income? I haven't looked that up but it would have into 8 figures. Maybe there's an alternative reinsurance for some in the really low income group. You know, 1500/month or less. Something thereabouts anyway

It’s not actually poverty driven as much with seniors. The main reason seniors end up on Medicaid is due to being placed in a nursing home. Only 17% of seniors are on Medicaid and over 60% of those people are nursing home patients.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BernardKingGOAT
Medicaid isn’t for seniors. You’re moving the goalposts. Tell me about Medicare
medicaid is for seniors. There is community medicaid for seniors that live at home and LTC medicaid for SNF. You are allowed a home and a car but other assets have to be less than 2,000 dollars.
 
  • Like
Reactions: newokie03
Some are. It’s a bit complicated but most senior care is paid for by Medicare. Medicaid mainly pays for poor people under 65
you have to have a secondary to insurance to cover pays. Medicaid will cover it. My dad uses AARP as a secondary insurance.
 
I can’t tell you specifically how influential any one person is to any president. Nor can you. I can only tell you it’s pretty widely known that Hunter was highly involved.

You know that, as well. But you’re hiding behind these disingenuous arguments. “What was his official title!”
Actually you don’t know that and neither do I. You’re operating on assumption, which means we have reached the limits of the usefulness of this interaction.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orange_Crush
Actually you don’t know that and neither do I. You’re operating on assumption, which means we have reached the limits of the usefulness of this interaction.

So despite the obvious, despite what the media even tells you about his role within the White House, you prefer to live in denial because I can’t tell you specifically the things he did?

Weird, but okay
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: SpaceCoastVol
How do you know there will not be enough waste and abuse to offset the cut amount? You “would think abuse will escalate”? What makes you believe that will happen.

And down the rabbit hole we go……

Can you all be happy with an administration that is identifying abuse and taking steps to correct it? Why make stuff up that you have no proof will happen?

We all knew this day had to come. We could not / can not continue down this path of thievery. I congratulate the fact it is being identified and happy we are doing something about it (No matter who is identifying it).
That's the point, there is no identification of waste or abuse, just a cut in funds
 
Advertisement

Back
Top