Apparently all college athletes are guilty until proven innocent (unless they play for FSU).
I don't comprehend it either, but I do remember the Duke team. All were immediately guilty and everyone on the team, including the coach, was punished and then Oops, it was all a lie by the "victim"; I also remember the Twana (sp?) case against the police, Oops, another "victim" lie. It seems like in rape charges, as in all others, the same standards should hold. I fear in some ways we are actually lessening the seriousness of the act by jumping the gun and finding guilt, then having innocence proven.
But even if he is innocent, and it is proven beyond a doubt, he will still be punished by being suspended, missing multiple games, possibly draft stock affected, etc. If he is guilty, throw him in jail and leave him for multiple years...that is how a rapist should be punished (I have some other ideas of suitable punishments, but they are not suitable for this board).
All because.....? Don't ask me, I was always taught "innocent until proven guilty" and thought that was one of the concepts that made the USA great.