BigOrangeD
Got Bitcoin?
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2010
- Messages
- 26,636
- Likes
- 20,652
Interesting read
If the blackmail theory sounds far-fetched, it’s worth keeping in mind that it was also floated by one of Epstein’s victims, Virginia Roberts Giuffre. “Epstein … also got girls for Epstein’s friends and acquaintances. Epstein specifically told me that the reason for him doing this was so that they would ‘owe him,’ they would ‘be in his pocket,’ and he would ‘have something on them,’” she said in a court affidavit, according to the investigative series in the Miami Herald that brought the case back to the public’s attention late last year.
In the 2015 filing, Giuffre claimed that Epstein “debriefed her” after she was forced into sexual encounters so that he could possess “intimate and potentially embarrassing information” to blackmail friends into parking their money with him. She also said photographic and video evidence existed — an assertion that looms especially large now that federal investigators have found a trove of images in Epstein’s home safe.
You put stock in the Epstein pedo cabal theories, OC?Did you read the article? It sounds almost "Q-ish".
Q claims that pedo-gate and Epstein Island are a blackmail operation where he gets video/photographic evidence against rich and powerful people (including politicians), and that video and photographic evidence exists that will blow Washington apart..
You mock that, then post this:
Did you read the article? It sounds almost "Q-ish".
Q claims that pedo-gate and Epstein Island are a blackmail operation where he gets video/photographic evidence against rich and powerful people (including politicians), and that video and photographic evidence exists that will blow Washington apart..
You mock that, then post this:
Q posts are like the Rorschach test.This article is based on questions posed to real hedge fund managers. They discuss their knowledge of Epstein (basically no one they know invests with him, something seems sketchy about his financial work) and make a HYPOTHESIS about what COULD be going on. It's never phrased as fact. Q, on the other hand, speaks in oracular code that you guys take out you decoder rings to try to decipher because you think he's asserting FACTS. Big difference.
Not sure? Not really? My attitude with TrumPutinStilskin, as well as the Q stuff has been, "I'll believe it when I see it."You put stock in the Epstein pedo cabal theories, OC?
And yet you mocked the possibility that Q could be true and then post an article that interviews his supposed peers, and published their hypothesis that would support the Q claims that you mocked. I was just curious if you actually made it all the way through the article.This article is based on questions posed to real hedge fund managers. They discuss their knowledge of Epstein (basically no one they know invests with him, something seems sketchy about his financial work) and make a HYPOTHESIS about what COULD be going on. It's never phrased as fact. Q, on the other hand, speaks in oracular code that you guys take out you decoder rings to try to decipher because you think he's asserting FACTS. Big difference.
Good answer. Provides insight.Not sure? Not really? My attitude with TrumPutinStilskin, as well as the Q stuff has been, "I'll believe it when I see it."
I've figured it's one of three things with Q...
Either it's fake, and is a Trump-op to drum up support against the D's, or...
It's true, nothing will ever happen to the offenders or prove the accusations, and it's all a Trump-op to drum up support against the D's, or...
It's true and the **** will hit the fan.
The more the onion is being peeled in the media, the more I'm willing to entertain that the third option is reality.
Not sure if that was enough of an answer.
The so called oracular code is for very good reason. You can't just straight up put classified info out for everyone but you can leave bread crumbs for bakers and anons to piece together. That is why it's done that way. Not all of what Q post is in oracular code. Much of it is in plain English.This article is based on questions posed to real hedge fund managers. They discuss their knowledge of Epstein (basically no one they know invests with him, something seems sketchy about his financial work) and make a HYPOTHESIS about what COULD be going on. It's never phrased as fact. Q, on the other hand, speaks in oracular code that you guys take out you decoder rings to try to decipher because you think he's asserting FACTS. Big difference.
That is a good way to look at it.Not sure? Not really? My attitude with TrumPutinStilskin, as well as the Q stuff has been, "I'll believe it when I see it."
I've figured it's one of three things with Q...
Either it's fake, and is a Trump-op to drum up support against the D's, or...
It's true, nothing will ever happen to the offenders or prove the accusations, and it's all a Trump-op to drum up support against the D's, or...
It's true and the **** will hit the fan.
The more the onion is being peeled in the media, the more I'm willing to entertain that the third option is reality.
Not sure if that was enough of an answer.
Good answer. Provides insight.
I know there are sexually perverted people in powerful positions. But I can't buy into the conspiracy. I mean how many theories have ever been verified.
I would love to see the wicked get some comeuppance, though.