Pizza time?

#886
#886
Stew Cook said:
Just so I understand, Acosta accepted.a terrible plea bargain from Epstein years ago so that the other girls cases, which were essentially made void by the deal, could be used in the future to being down an elite pedo ring?

I think the only way this narrative works is to go back to the Mueller working with Trump theory that some Q enthusiasts subscribed to.
Click to expand...

I think Acosta got coerced by a higher up and accepted that terrible plea deal to it. Obviously Trump and company knew about that deal. I think Mueller was installed to try to prevent these elite pedo rings and other oligarchical crimes from getting touched.
 
#887
#887
Burger said:
I think Acosta got coerced by a higher up and accepted that terrible plea deal to it. Obviously Trump and company knew about that deal. I think Mueller was installed to try to prevent these elite pedo rings and other oligarchical crimes from getting touched.
Click to expand...
It’s amazing how some of you have no problem accusing people of enabling child rape with not a shred of proof. It’s actually disgusting.
 
#888
#888
Orangeburst65 said:
The question is where is the book?
Click to expand...

I found an article that shows pictures from the book. Apparently Gawker obtained the pics of the book.....at work, cant spend anymore time on this I have to do stuff hahaha.
Dig around on the articles linked in the last couple of pages of this thread and one of them has a link you can click on to see the pics
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orangeburst
#890
#890
Burger said:
I'm saying there's something nefarious that goes beyond Acosta.
Click to expand...


The part where he said proof. You don't have any.

And I have seen nothing that says that Acosta did this as a favor for someone or under political pressure. I think most of the criticism has centered on the notion that he entered into a bad deal due to being incompetent, not corrupt.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigOrangeD
#891
#891
lawgator1 said:
The part where he said proof. You don't have any.

And I have seen nothing that says that Acosta did this as a favor for someone or under political pressure. I think most of the criticism has centered on the notion that he entered into a bad deal due to being incompetent, not corrupt.
Click to expand...

Asked about Acosta, Trump said the plea deal happened many years ago and that he did not think this was a decision that Acosta made on his own.

It's being looked at.
 
#892
#892
Burger said:
Asked about Acosta, Trump said the plea deal happened many years ago and that he did not think this was a decision that Acosta made on his own.

It's being looked at.
Click to expand...

Acosta gave a really lengthy and thorough press briefing today, and didn't mention anything about any direction being given outside of his jurisdiction.
 
#896
#896
BUBear said:
Vanity Fair: Trump Knew Jeffrey Epstein Had Incriminating Photos of Bill Clinton

Back in 2015, onstage at the annual CPAC conference, Trump said something very interesting about Bill Clinton. "Nice guy," he said. "Got a lot of problems coming up, in my opinion, with the famous island with Jeffrey Epstein. Lot of problems."
Trump knew what he was talking about. Vanity Fair reports that, shortly before CPAC, Trump was approached by David Pecker, who then owned the National Enquirer. Pecker visited Trump and brought along "an issue with a Prince Andrew and Epstein-related cover." They were joined by Trump lawyer Michael Cohen.
After the meeting, Trump called in Sam Nunberg, who then worked for him. Nunberg told Vanity Fair:

“Michael was sitting in there when I came in, and the issue of the National Enquirer with the pictures of Prince Andrew was on his desk. He said not to tell anyone, but that Pecker had just been there and had brought the issue with him. Trump said that Pecker had told him that the pictures of Clinton that Epstein had from his island were worse."​

What makes Vanity Fair's report double fascinating is that the leftist magazine clearly implies that Epstein doesn't have any dirt on Trump himself. On Twitter, leftist users have been tweeting hopefully about how this could ruin Trump's presidency. Vanity Fair knows better. When push comes to shove, this case will involve high-ranking and extremely influential Democrats.
Click to expand...
Dude's name is Pecker !!

The comedy writes itself nowadays.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NorthDallas40, volinsd, Burger and 1 other person
New Posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

Advertisement



Back
Top