Pizza time?

#853
#853
Orange_Vol1321 said:
Wow, talk about a shady website.
Click to expand...
It had the full video.
attractive-woman-stylish-makeup-putting-hands-latex-gloves-woman-latex-gloves-127375337.jpg
 
#855
#855
BigOrangeD said:
I could see that. What's good for the goose is good for the gander?
Click to expand...

I think this has been in the works for awhile. The one thing Sessions has done is the massive amount of pedos being arrested. Sessions wanted to get the elite pedo rings. I think the whole Mueller thing just intensified this revenge.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigOrangeD
#858
#858
Burger said:
I think this has been in the works for awhile. The one thing Sessions has done is the massive amount of pedos being arrested. Sessions wanted to get the elite pedo rings. I think the whole Mueller thing just intensified this revenge.
Click to expand...

Just so I understand, Acosta accepted.a terrible plea bargain from Epstein years ago so that the other girls cases, which were essentially made void by the deal, could be used in the future to being down an elite pedo ring?

I think the only way this narrative works is to go back to the Mueller working with Trump theory that some Q enthusiasts subscribed to.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mick
#861
#861
Stew Cook said:
Just so I understand, Acosta accepted.a terrible plea bargain from Epstein years ago so that the other girls cases, which were essentially made void by the deal, could be used in the future to being down an elite pedo ring?

I think the only way this narrative works is to go back to the Mueller working with Trump theory that some Q enthusiasts subscribed to.
Click to expand...
That's quite a stretch Stew. I don't know about that one man. :)
 
#867
#867
RockyTop85 said:
Sure. People with money get treated differently, all the time. Whether this was more than generic classism, I don’t know enough to say. It’s possible.

I think it’s an interesting situation, but I haven’t had a chance to look into it too much, and apparently being totally wrong in my assumption about the existence of this law, as applied to a declination or prosecution agreement,* has me wanting to read about the federal lawsuit before talking out of my ass, again.

How hard did the feds look at this? How much work actually went into negotiating the declination agreement? How strong were the cases? How much additional time could he have gotten from the feds? How much knowledge did they have of the details of the Florida plea agreement? How much outreach did they have from the victims? What responses did they receive and from whom?

I’d still want to know those things before calling for Acosta’s head.

* - after reading the statute, I’m still not 100% sure it applies to this precise situation, but this judge found they didn’t communicate sufficiently with the victims, so I’ll defer to him on the facts and applicability.
Click to expand...
Exactly.... at least, the part I put in bold.
 
#869
#869
  • Like
Reactions: Orangeburst
#875
#875
BowlBrother85 said:
Yeah... right here, fellas. So, which one of us is talking out of their butt (@Orange Crush)?
Click to expand...

Oh, I still think you were. It would seem that a liberal judge in Miami called the actions into question in response to a civil case. The judge never mentioned Acosta's name as the headline implied--just "federal prosecutors", and he is referencing a law that states that prosecutors have to inform victims before entering into plea agreements. Since Acosta wasn't prosecuting a case or heading up a plea agreement, it definitely looks like political bull-ish bench statement, but I'm cool to see it play out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orange_Vol1321 and BigOrangeD
New Posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

Advertisement



Back
Top