Pizza time?

#526
#526
BowlBrother85 said:
Ann isn't assigning enough blame to Acosta for the lenient sentence that Epstein was given. There is no excuse as to why Acosta didn't inform the victims of the Epstein plea agreement beforehand. This was in direct violation of the law. Coulter also conveniently leaves out the fact that Trump made Acosta the Secretary of Labor. That is how this became a Trump scandal and why it will remain such until Acosta steps down.
Click to expand...
Acosta’s resignation will be sweet justice for Epstein’s victims.

Good to see you’re putting political differences to the side and focused on getting justice for the victims.
 
#527
#527
lawgator1 said:
I frequently criticize Democrats here. I would also give Republicans with some sense of integrity and a spine when it comes to Trump a lot of credit. If there were any.
Click to expand...
You’re so warped by Trump you should apply for all the major TDS networks - CNN, MSNBC, CNBC, NBC, CBS, ABC, etc - you’d fit right in.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orange_Vol1321
#528
#528
lawgator1 said:
I frequently criticize Democrats here. I would also give Republicans with some sense of integrity and a spine when it comes to Trump a lot of credit. If there were any.
Click to expand...
There are some decent Republicans/Conservatives on the board. There are also a whole lot of Red Hats that only care about defending/propping up Trump.
 
#530
#530
BowlBrother85 said:
Trump made it that way when he brought in Alex Acosta as Secretary of Labor. Why not fire Acosta right now? As a Trump scandal, it is not absurd at all. It has been established that Alex Acosta broke the law when he didn't inform Epstein's victims of the plea deal before the state entered into it. As prosecutor, that was his job. That is inexcusable. Until Acosta is gone, this is definitely a Trump scandal.

Why the hell is it so important to have Alex Acosta as the Secretary of Labor? He is a cancer now, anyway. Fire him and replace him with someone that isn't. This shouldn't be a hard decision. So, once again, why is Alex Acosta still Secretary of Labor? Is he the only one capable of doing the job? I highly doubt it.
Click to expand...

Totally obsessed. This isn’t normal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1972 Grad and Orange_Vol1321
#532
#532
Last edited:
#533
#533
BowlBrother85 said:
I didn't make it all the way to the end. My apologies, but I have now. She says that Trump didn't know Acosta was a part of the Epstein prosecution (which is impossible to verify) but obviously, Trump did know about Acosta's involvement in the lenient Epstein plea deal during Acosta's confirmation hearing for Secretary of Labor because he was asked about it. It was a hot topic. It also came to light during the Acosta confirmation hearing that Acosta had broken the law by not informing the victims of the plea deal beforehand. Yet, Acosta's confirmation vote proceeded anyway.... and he was even confirmed.

Trump is obviously well aware today that Acosta did not inform the victims before entering into the plea agreement with this pedophile.... and here is Acosta still serving as his Secretary of Labor. That is inexcusable. Acosta should have been fired this morning!
Click to expand...
Maybe Acosta told Trump he wanted to bust Epstein's ass now that they have more they can charge him with
 
  • Like
Reactions: BUBear
#534
#534
ajvol01 said:
We get it. You’ve got a YUGE hard-on for Acosta.
Click to expand...
Alex Acosta, apparently, has compromising information on Trump, and so he can't be fired. It is why Trump gave Acosta a cabinet position that he wasn't qualified for in the first place. I'm thinking, that Trump was in attendance (if not an actual participant) at Jeffrey Epstein's Manhattan mansion for at least one of Epstein's orgies where underage girls were sexually abused. Trump will not dare fire Acosta, because Acosta has proof.
 
#535
#535
Stew Cook said:
It's a picture of Rachel Chandler at age 19 on Ron Burkles jet.

The picture originated from a Gawker article in 2009 which referenced an article from 2006. Somehow it got turned into her being 14, or 15 depending on how many times the picture had been stepped on by Q sleuths.

Bill Clinton Doesn't Want Ron Burkle's Dirty (Nonexistent?) $20 Million
Click to expand...
You must've missed this related piece.

Total exoneration of slick willy.

Five Creepy Old Men Who Should Settle Down (And One Who's Cool)
 
#537
#537
BowlBrother85 said:
Alex Acosta, apparently, has compromising information on Trump, and so he can't be fired. It is why Trump gave Acosta a cabinet position that he wasn't qualified for in the first place. I'm thinking, that Trump was in attendance (if not an actual participant) at Jeffrey Epstein's Manhattan mansion for at least one of Epstein's orgies where underage girls were sexually abused. Trump will not dare fire Acosta, because Acosta has proof.
Click to expand...
You're certifiable.

You remind me of some of the true believers (myself included) from the original Gruden threads circa 2012.
 
#538
#538
ajvol01 said:
You're certifiable.

You remind me of some of the true believers (myself included) from the original Gruden threads circa 2012.
Click to expand...
If Trump ever fires Acosta... then I will admit that I had it wrong but as long as Alex Acosta is the Secretary of Labor? That is what I believe and it makes perfect sense.
 
#542
#542
Stew Cook said:
Sure, but not Epstein's jet.. And no need for NSA forensics.
Click to expand...
Ever consider there's a whole lot more photos that aren't released to the public?

I'd wager a guess that the guilty parties are very concerned about the CDs/DVDs collected from Epstein's safe.

If the NSA has the original digital files with metadata there is no denying it. No deepfake excuse.

If they used their phones it's just a matter of time.
 
#543
#543
BowlBrother85 said:
Alex Acosta, apparently, has compromising information on Trump, and so he can't be fired. It is why Trump gave Acosta a cabinet position that he wasn't qualified for in the first place. I'm thinking, that Trump was in attendance (if not an actual participant) at Jeffrey Epstein's Manhattan mansion for at least one of Epstein's orgies where underage girls were sexually abused. Trump will not dare fire Acosta, because Acosta has proof.
Click to expand...
Maybe Acosta knew everything about Epstein's crimes, but knew he couldn't win a conviction in the courts due to political influence.

I have no clue.

His responsibility for human trafficking makes me seriously question the media / democrat narrative that Acosta must resign.

Let Acosta do his job. Epstein is going down, but i get the feeling this case is just the tip of the iceberg.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BUBear
#544
#544
ajvol01 said:
Ever consider there's a whole lot more photos that aren't released to the public?

I'd wager a guess that the guilty parties are very concerned about the CDs/DVDs collected from Epstein's safe.

If the NSA has the original digital files with metadata there is no denying it. No deepfake excuse.

If they used their phones it's just a matter of time.
Click to expand...

I was just illustrating how this one consensual photo was being twisted into something it never was.

But yeah, anyone who has anything to worry about, with regards to being photographed/filmed in compromising sexual situations with minors, especially, would be very concerned.

A digital file can have metada faked too, btw.. it would be somewhat more difficult to do if it resided on the original device that photographed or recorded it.
 
#545
#545
ajvol01 said:
Maybe Acosta knew everything about Epstein's crimes, but knew he couldn't win a conviction in the courts due to political influence.

I have no clue.

His responsibility for human trafficking makes me seriously question the media / democrat narrative that Acosta must resign.

Let Acosta do his job. Epstein is going down, but i get the feeling this case is just the tip of the iceberg.
Click to expand...
I hate to keep repeating myself, but there is no excuse for Alex Acosta not informing Jeffrey Epstein's victims of the plea deal the state had reached with Epstein's defense team, before it was entered in court. As an experienced prosecutor of sex abuse crimes, Acosta knew that was the law and he broke it. Trump knew that Acosta had broken the law, and yet, nominated him for Secretary of Labor and then didn't withdraw the nomination when Acosta was pressed on it during his confirmation hearing.
 
#546
#546
Stew Cook said:
I was just illustrating how this one consensual photo was being twisted into something it never was.

But yeah, anyone who has anything to worry about, with regards to being photographed/filmed in compromising sexual situations with minors, especially, would be very concerned.
Click to expand...
I never took the photo as anything salacious.

It is interesting how Clinton just so happens to be friendly enough to have a photo taken with one of Epstein's rumored/alleged recruiters who herself happened to be 19 years old when the photo was taken.

On a sidenote, Rachel Chandler's instagram is/was creepy AF.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BUBear
#547
#547
BowlBrother85 said:
I hate to keep repeating myself, but there is no excuse for Alex Acosta not informing Jeffrey Epstein's victims of the plea deal the state had reached with Epstein's defense team, before it was entered in court. As an experienced prosecutor of sex abuse crimes, Acosta knew that was the law and he broke it. Trump knew that Acosta had broken the law, and yet, nominated him for Secretary of Labor and then didn't withdraw the nomination when Acosta was pressed on it during his confirmation hearing.
Click to expand...
This entire thing is a cluster****.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BowlBrother85
#548
#548
BowlBrother85 said:
I hate to keep repeating myself, but there is no excuse for Alex Acosta not informing Jeffrey Epstein's victims of the plea deal the state had reached with Epstein's defense team, before it was entered in court. As an experienced prosecutor of sex abuse crimes, Acosta knew that was the law and he broke it. Trump knew that Acosta had broken the law, and yet, nominated him for Secretary of Labor and then didn't withdraw the nomination when Acosta was pressed on it during his confirmation hearing.
Click to expand...
I get it - i read the same in your previous 10 posts.

I think the world won't end if we let this play out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BUBear
#550
#550
D--_ohVW4AEYAQa.jpg
 
New Posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

Advertisement



Back
Top