Pizza time?

No, it's the same if the dude is ****ing 66

Really? Abusing a 4 year old who has no agency and is the most innocent of the innocent is the same thing as banging a 17 year old who can rat you out/fight you, and who is one year away from voting?

I think you're the one that's twisted, no offense.
 
Really? Abusing a 4 year old who has no agency and is the most innocent of the innocent is the same thing as banging a 17 year old who can rat you out/fight you, and who is one year away from voting?

I think you're the one that's twisted, no offense.
Lol it's clear that you just argue for the sake of it. Imagine sticking up for a guy who had sex with underage minors up to 50+ years younger.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zues1
Yeah, and they never once banged, I'm sure.
Stick with what you know for certain. Tossing that out in the middle of good questions differentiating abuse of a 4 year and a 17 year old is distracting.
 
There has to be a line set somewhere. I am completely okay with the 18 year old line. I'd rather not change the age of consent because some sick freak would lower it to 14. If we take this to the logical extreme because it seems like most ideas end up there, are you okay with a 32 year old banging a 6 year old because you're blurring lines that can end there.

Btw Barr has a thing for putting pedos in jail:

1,700 alleged online sex offenders arrested during operation ‘Broken Heart’ | ZDNet
 
  • Like
Reactions: BUBear
My bad, they started courting at age 14. Much better.

What does clarifying the definition of words have to do with the LDS church? Are you saying that diddling a 4 year old is the same thing as having sex with a 17 year old?
It isnt the same. Some states still allow young teenagers to wed with parental consent.
 
  • Like
Reactions: n_huffhines
There has to be a line set somewhere. I am completely okay with the 18 year old line. I'd rather not change the age of consent because some sick freak would lower it to 14. If we take this to the logical extreme because it seems like most ideas end up there, are you okay with a 32 year old banging a 6 year old because you're blurring lines that can end there.

Btw Barr has a thing for putting pedos in jail:

1,700 alleged online sex offenders arrested during operation ‘Broken Heart’ | ZDNet

My grandmother got married at 14 or 15. Some states still allow such with parental consent.
 
My grandmother got married at 14 or 15. Some states still allow such with parental consent.
I'm guessing that was at least 60 years ago though, right? That sort of thing used to be common, especially in the south. One of my grandmother's sisters married when she was 15... but that was in 1938. Times have changed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Big Gucci Sosa
I'm guessing that was at least 60 years ago though, right? That sort of thing used to be common, especially in the south. One of my grandmother's sisters married when she was 15... but that was in 1938. Times have changed.
Not for some.
 
There has to be a line set somewhere. I am completely okay with the 18 year old line. I'd rather not change the age of consent because some sick freak would lower it to 14. If we take this to the logical extreme because it seems like most ideas end up there, are you okay with a 32 year old banging a 6 year old because you're blurring lines that can end there.

Btw Barr has a thing for putting pedos in jail:

1,700 alleged online sex offenders arrested during operation ‘Broken Heart’ | ZDNet

I don't think anybody is arguing that the age of consent should be changed. I'm saying there is a difference between a 4 year old and a 17 year old. I don't know where the legal line should be drawn between children and adolescents and when it becomes a worse crime, but there is a clear biological line.
 
I don't think anybody is arguing that the age of consent should be changed. I'm saying there is a difference between a 4 year old and a 17 year old. I don't know where the legal line should be drawn between children and adolescents and when it becomes a worse crime, but there is a clear biological line.
There is a psychological line too, imo.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Burger
I don't think anybody is arguing that the age of consent should be changed. I'm saying there is a difference between a 4 year old and a 17 year old. I don't know where the legal line should be drawn between children and adolescents and when it becomes a worse crime, but there is a clear biological line.

I know you're not advocating for that. I just made the extreme example to point out why there is a line. Making that line fuzzy can make the 6 year old giving consent thing legally viable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: n_huffhines
Lol......Wikipedia has already been updated to scrub Clinton's name. Only a matter of time until Epstein commits suicide by shooting himself twice in the back of the head.

I don't understand why "Desiree Mills (Dez)" in the tweet, thinks this is "frightening". Anyone can edit WikiPedia. If a Trump supporter doesn't like what is on there? They could literally edit Jeffrey Epstein's bio themselves to say that Epstein, Bill Clinton and Harvey Weinstein had an orgy with the Olsen twins back in the 90's. People only browse WikiPedia for general information, such as someone's age and whether or not they are married, or even still alive. Nobody goes there for significant details beyond that, unless they are being a little lazy.
 
Right, and the people that yearn for pedo gate to be true are just patriots
Who’s yearning?

Have you actually researched any of this yourself?

It’s not about whether or not it’s true - it’s whether or not the victims will ever get any measure of justice.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hjeagle1vol

Advertisement



Back
Top