Yeah, but that means nothing about our chances against a team led by Slovis.
Just because Pickett was relatively unknown then, and Slovis is relatively unknown now, that in no way implies Slovis is going to be any good. Much less Heisman consideration good. Bad QBs start out relatively unknown, too.
There's a name for that kind of logical error...something to do with a false equivalency, I'm thinking.
We gonna whup dey butts. Go Vols!
Well, it isn't really a false equivalency because I'm not saying that Slovis is going to be good at Pitt simply
because Pickett was good at Pitt. At least it isn't any more of a false equivalency than you suggesting that Slovis won't be as productive as Pickett at Pitt because he wasn't invited to the Heisman ceremony, this year.
I'm just saying that Slovis has an opportunity to have a similar impact at Pitt as a true senior that Pickett did as a 5th-year senior. In fact, thru their freshman, sophomore, and junior years, Slovis has equal or better numbers in eight fewer games.
Slovis:
7576 yds, 58 TDs, 24 INTs in 27 career games
Pickett (minus his 4-game true freshman season):
7475 yds, 38 TDs, 24 INTs in 35 career games
And in the interest of full disclosure, just because Slovis has the opportunity doesn't mean he'll take full advantage of it, either.