johnboyhunter
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2011
- Messages
- 2,832
- Likes
- 2,312
I’ve been at 2 games where we tore down goal posts in the mid 80s. Doesn’t happen enough these days. Guess it’s dangerous. But then again back then we road in my grandpas truck windows up while he smoked unfiltered camels with no seat belts.It may not be a rivalry to you but Fla is public enemy #1 in our state. Some of us would trade a whole season of L's for that 1 win, especially if Fla is on top at the time. I talked cash ish for 2yrs straight after the 2016 win. Still to this day Fla is the only team I've seen us tear down goal posts after beating. That game means alot to us
I have always said that a rivalry has to have implications in your back yard. As such, Florida-Tennessee has never been a rivalry.
The same as the Patriots-Colts is not a rivalry. There was a period when Brady and Manning were on those teams and they played heated games with a lot of meaning. Now that they are gone, no one cares. Whereas Browns-Steelers is forever.
Same applies to Florida-Tennessee. During the 90’s when the game was meaningful, it got treated like a rivalry and people called it a rivalry. But, to me, it wasn’t. And it’s not. If South Carolina became a top 10 team and Florida and Carolina battled it out for divisional supremacy for a decade, I wouldn’t consider that a rivalry either
I don’t have to take heat from a neighbor or co-worker when Florida loses to Tennessee and if I do, it’s a Florida State or Georgia fan giving me the heat
In this hypothetical, you can't.
Because right now we have permanent, annual rivalry games with Bama, Vandy, Kentucky, Florida and Georgia (5, already busted the hypothetical limit of 4), plus USCe and Mizzou. We play those seven teams every single year.
What if we couldn't?
So imagine that the SEC does away with divisions in football, and establishes a rotating 9-game SEC play slate for each year.
As part of that new alignment, each team gets 4 permanent rivals, teams they play every year. The other 5 games rotate among the remaining 9 SEC members.
Who would you pick as the 4 permanent rivals? There are cases to be made for several of them:
- Vandy is our in-state foe. And, in a nod back to the days of Neyland, our key conference rival for leadership of the SIAA, the Southern Conference and the early SEC.
- Kentucky we've played more often than any other team (111 times), and used to have a border war trophy to compete over.
- Bama is most hated foe for many of the older crowd here; it took over from Vandy as the fight for top position during the middle years of the SEC.
- Florida and Georgia have been our top rivals for SEC East lead since introduction of divisions in 1992; lot of hate for both those programs.
- Strong historic ties with Auburn. Same for Ole Miss. In fact, after Kentucky, Vandy and Bama, those are the two teams we've played most often.
But that's seven teams. Too many to all be yearly foes.
Which four would you pick?
Me, I think I'd go with Bama, Vandy, Kentucky and Auburn. But it's really hard to choose just four.
I don’t get the idea of we’ve got to get rid of Bama because they beat us every year, but it’s ok to keep Florida because they keep beating us every year.
I'm going to be the heretic again and say that I don't care that much about keeping the annual Bama game.
IMHO, having that game as a near guaranteed loss over the last 15 years has hurt UT's chances of recovery.
Yeah. This is the kind of stupidity I was afraid of.These days our "chances of recovery" are being hurt more by losing to Kentucky, uSC, Mizzou and even Vandy. Everybody is losing to Bama. But sure, screw tradition. Let's drop Bama and add the Pennsylvania Institute for Gynecological Studies. Go PIGS........
These days our "chances of recovery" are being hurt more by losing to Kentucky, uSC, Mizzou and even Vandy. Everybody is losing to Bama. But sure, screw tradition. Let's drop Bama and add the Pennsylvania Institute for Gynecological Studies. Go PIGS........