LittleDTO
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2006
- Messages
- 8,422
- Likes
- 4,608
Was that supposed to be funny?
Once you make a fool out of yourself by claiming to be an insider that knows the scoop it is hard to shake it off. Especially when you do it on the same subject day after day after day.
This is the reason you have to defend yourself everytime you post something. As you get older and start to mature it will all come to light.
I expect a full apology from you soon.
Secondly, it's pretty freakin funny how little you are able to comprehend words. Never once have I claimed or attempted to claim being an insider. In fact, most of the guys I know, have been gone from the program for years.
However, thanks for allowing me to live, rent free, in that head of yours. I'm sure it gets in the way of the fry timer that you have to monitor.
Obviously not, rooster. I don't know why you'd even suggest it as humor.. Just asenine. ../blue
On a more serious note..
I would place a wager that I don't find humor in all the same things as you two, or any other individual, for that matter. Yes, I have a dry, dark humor. My mistake? I'm sorry you failed to see the joke.. Maybe you guys go to school with Petie? Whoops, there I am again!
Anyway, my post wasn't really offensive, nor did I attack anyone specifically beyond throwing a clearly untrue jab at Nate. I'm sure you'll counter with "at the expense of dumb/blind kids," but honestly, it was very generalized, and didn't really degrade either, at all, so.. not really.
I guess I just don't understand why either of you replied. I guess I'll start replying to jokes too, asking rhetorical questions about their intended purpose. Do I only do that when I disagree with the joke, don't understand the joke, or have some connection with the butt of the joke? Please clarify for me, guys. TIA.
Lots of people on this board have a dark and dry sense of humor, including myself. Nate seems like a good guy that I'd get along with, but I will admit I've cracked a joke or two at his expense.
Your joke was just lame and not funny. That's why I put that.
Agreed.Would think Dormady would have the initial advantage over Jones with him going to Spring Practice but will be a fun batgle to watch. Not sure Jennings ever plays QB but if by some chance he does he would be the most likely FR to need to RS.
JJ is throwing with Dobbs. Dormady isn't throwing yet (last I asked).
The QB recruits were all told that they have the shot at battling out for number 2 and Peterman would be leaving.
JJ is picking up the offense pretty well so the spring game should be fun to watch.
JJ is throwing with Dobbs. Dormady isn't throwing yet (last I asked).
The QB recruits were all told that they have the shot at battling out for number 2 and Peterman would be leaving.
JJ is picking up the offense pretty well so the spring game should be fun to watch.
I don't think we're going to see Dobbs or any QB being consistent behind an OL like we had this past year. Worley wasn't consistent, either. He had as many, if not more, missed throws in each of his games.That's good to hear on JJ. I honestly don't have a preference on who I want to play QB I just want to see consistency like we used to have. Do you see the skillset in JJ as far as his passing ability? That's my concern with Dobbs is can he be consistent as a passer. I know Dormady and Jones are more polished in the pass game than JJ and would think if all 3 fr qb's healthy that just from a straight learning the position that JJ would benefit the most of the three.jmo, just from hearing these recruiting guys it seemsto that JJ has more upside as a safety than QB. Then Kendall coming in next class we will have a huge logjam at QB.
