Dudleys87
2B1A1
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2009
- Messages
- 37,488
- Likes
- 35,447
Physically they're similar players except JG seems to be more accurate and Shrout seems to have a stronger arm. Only by degrees on both.
What we know that JG can't do isn't physical though. He doesn't make good reads. He takes too long to process info. He lacks the confidence to anticipate throws or lead receivers into catches. He's very risk averse and will quickly go to the check down or safe throw when a better play is available.
We don't know how Shrout will do making decisions. We do know JG is terrible at it. The physical part matters much, much less.
Glad you recognize him now. But you are still wrong about last year. They protected him and he played so risk averse that his "averages" looked good even though he was nowhere near productive or effective enough to make the O go.Agreed. Last year yes, absolutely, he was by far our best option.
This year?...he’s gone from a fairly solid, mistake free QB who could occasionally elevate his play to a high level and win some games (auburn and Kentucky), to an absolute bust who not only doesn’t help you win but who actually causes you to lose.
Gotta start Shrout and see what you have with him, see what he can do. And the only way JG sees the field is if Shrout’s play is catastrophic.
I don't think we know that though. It isn't arm talent that makes Maurer so deadly with RPO's and JG... not. I don't know if Shrout can accurately stick an RPO like Maurer. I don't know if Shrout can anticipate throws and throw guys open. JG has proven he pretty much can't. Last year Pruitt when asked about JG and KC volunteered that Shrout anticipated throws the best of the 3.This was my problem.. I understand and think I know the mental side of the equation of JG as well as any of us and the lack of same for Shrout. It was the differences in talent that I wanted to know. Thanks for the comparison. This points up what I was saying that SC has to prepare on plan for whoever plays. No difference as I see it. Coach P seems to be playing the waiting game for the benefit of us fans and our reaction. If it is JG....
Like it or not, I agree with this. IF Shrout starts, maybe Pruitt told JG he's going to come in off the bench like Lamonte Turner...seems he does come in more settled off the bench. Regardless, Muschamp will lick his chops against a first time starter on stunts/blitz's. JMO...a conservative JG game plan gives us best chance to win. I just haven't seen Shrout show much off the bench so far, but you know whoever they put out there, they think gives us best chance to win...so, I'm good either way.Agree but he gives us the best opportunity to win in the rain imo.
All Shrout needs is the right game plan:
Short passes to get his feet under him and hand the ball off to Jordan. Big backs in the rain all day long.
So, you don't want people to be done with JG however you want to trash JT by saying he can't do it before even seeing him play? You really think Pruitt is losing to Will Muschamp and SC just to prove a point?So all of you who want JG to be run out on a rail want to lose just for revenge? I think will be a cold day in hell before JG does something like that again. If he is the best option to get a win then he should play. I would hate to lose just to prove a point.