GreatWhiteNorth
God of War
- Joined
- Sep 2, 2007
- Messages
- 26,198
- Likes
- 8,955
If you like reading, read this.
Michael Weinreb on Joe Paterno, Jerry Sandusky, and dealing with the controversy at Penn State - Grantland
Penn State football coach Joe Paterno says he's disappointed university President Graham Spanier has canceled the team's weekly press conference, without explanation, this morning. The press conference was supposed to begin in an hour, at 12:30 p.m., and Spanier canceled it without conferring with the coach, Paterno said.
-Pennlive
Fact is, there is no way that Paterno, the President, or anyone else with knowledge can survive this. Someone on the Board has to step up, demand the firing of all of them, and start over.
This is going to cripple that program for a decade because whoever they bring in is going to have to be squeaky clean, and run a program beyond reproach.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
No, not true. As a PA attorney myself, the PA Attorney General has charged exactly what the law permits them to charge. Conspiracy and all that crap is not applicable law in this matter, the case would never make it to Court, because the charges would be dropped, because they do not apply to this case. Conspiracy you need an explicit agreement between all parties, that is not existent here.
Joe Paterno wand Graham Spanier must go. I am confident they will. I would be surpruised if Spanier makes it past the Friday Board of Trustees meeting which Governor Corbett is attending.
Pressure has ramped up even more so today. One of the most respect newspaper in the sate, Harrisburg Patriot, called on Paterno and Spanier to resign today, editorial right on the front page. Here is the link
OUR VIEW: Penn State's Graham Spanier, Joe Paterno need to leave as result of Jerry Sandusky case. Doing what the law required wasn't enough | PennLive.com
Fact is, there is no way that Paterno, the President, or anyone else with knowledge can survive this. Someone on the Board has to step up, demand the firing of all of them, and start over.
This is going to cripple that program for a decade because whoever they bring in is going to have to be squeaky clean, and run a program beyond reproach.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
That is an affirmative misstatement of law. Under PA law, you absolutely don't have to have an explicit agreement. The agreement can be inferred from the fact situation that they knew what the goals of the conspiracy was and knew or should have known what was going on. There is ample evidence to argue that they should have known that Sandusky's goal was to utilize the facilities to rape kids and Penn State continuing to allow him to use those facilities is enough to indict them for conspiracy.
This story is even crazier that in 1998 he admitted to one of the first victims that he did something inappropriate. Two detectives brought it to the local da who decided not to pursue charges.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
This story is even crazier that in 1998 he admitted to one of the first victims that he did something inappropriate. Two detectives brought it to the local da who decided not to pursue charges.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
I agree unless there is some type of case law in PA that makes conspiracy there different than conspiracy in the majority of the rest of the country.
"The conduct of the parties and the circumstances surrounding such conduct may create a web of evidence linking the accused to the alleged conspiracy beyond a reasonable doubt."
"An agreement can be inferred from a variety of circumstances including, but not limited to, the relation between the parties, knowledge of and participation in the crime, and the circumstances and conduct of the parties surrounding the criminal episode; these factors may coalesce to establish a conspiratorial agreement beyond a reasonable doubt where one factor alone might fail."
