Outgoing Transfer Portal...

#51
#51
Mike Matthews will bargain for a deal that we can't offer and likely leave for another school .. someone is going to offer him crazy money
I tend to believe guys who've flirted with the portal previously are going to keep going back for another bite of the apple every chance they get. Eventually, they'll price themselves beyond what UT will be willing to pay. Won't be surprised to see Matthews pull the trigger this year especially with the uncertainty at QB next season. Heck, I think any of our receivers will be more than a little wary and may entertain offers.
 
#52
#52
He has suitors. There are coaches who think they can get him back to last yr. He’s wanted out since summer.

Now it’s mutual. He may not play another down for tn.
Good riddance. A toxic kid who sponged lots of money for poor play and awful effort. He will be a project for anyone desperate enough to take him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: walkenvol and vol94
#54
#54
Boo is definitely gone and at this point it's for the best...but he'll go somewhere and play offense and we'll see what could have been...
Just another player/team to hate watch next season. Give. The current status of our program and that schedule next year we need to have as many teams to hate watch as possible to keep Saturdays interesting.
 
#55
#55
I’d prefer to go with skill over time. Merk doesn’t have all that much in-game time.

I’d assume start gmac.

One of them should have had playing time in the Kentucky game. CJH is at a fault for not giving backup QBs more time.
Because of Nico leaving so late, Heupel was faced with his QB1 having had LESS reps with the team than his backups so Joey A actually needed reps.

Yet another way Nico screwed us over. He made it difficult for the backups to get game reps because Joey A really needed them more than the backups.
 
#56
#56
Should
Because of Nico leaving so late, Heupel was faced with his QB1 having had LESS reps with the team than his backups so Joey A actually needed reps.

Yet another way Nico screwed us over. He made it difficult for the backups to get game reps because Joey A really needed them more than the backups.
should have gotten reps during the KY game
 
#57
#57
Mike Matthews will bargain for a deal that we can't offer and likely leave for another school .. someone is going to offer him crazy money
He’s being paid like a 1 and he’s the third best in a starting 3 rotation. Let him walk. Staley has the potential to be an all time great.
 
#59
#59
Should

should have gotten reps during the KY game
On the surface I agree but I suspect Coach Heupel isn't comfortable with something:

Joey's grasp of the offense?
Our D's ability to keep teams from scoring?
QB2 and/or QB3's readiness for SEC play?

Normally, we'd have seen backups. Heupel has done that in games where we had comfortable leads since he got here. He didn't and that says something.

I can't say for sure but it isn't normal for Heupel to not pull the QB1 with a decent lead.
 
#60
#60
I tend to believe guys who've flirted with the portal previously are going to keep going back for another bite of the apple every chance they get. Eventually, they'll price themselves beyond what UT will be willing to pay. Won't be surprised to see Matthews pull the trigger this year especially with the uncertainty at QB next season. Heck, I think any of our receivers will be more than a little wary and may entertain offers.

Matthews is worth whatever number it takes.
 
#64
#64
We'll always have guys that are encouraged to look elsewhere. As for high profile/starting types, I'm gonna go with:

Boo
Gibson
Matthews
Merklinger

Kinda think Gilbert might consider a fresh start as well....if he can find a suitable landing spot.
Gilbert needs to go, he probably has a raging inferno on the bridge to fans. Key misses in 2 losses is never good
 
  • Like
Reactions: BrianVol94
#66
#66
Unfortunately I think we lose some depth on OL - guys like Sattlerwhite, Warren and Anderson can all go elsewhere and get more playing time but that will kill our depth…hopefully they like being Vols and like the coaches and will stay but keeping quality depth everywhere is gonna be a challenge..

We have some real studs at WR and more coming in but plenty of uncertainty as to the QB…wouldn’t surprise me if we lost a WR or two…and if I remember correctly, more WRs seem to go into the portal than any other position - it’s kind of the Prima Donna position in modern football

Hope we don’t lose any DBs to the portal - some might go pro but we need to get some more DBs out of the portal and can’t really afford to lose anyone. Pay Redmond because he’s likely our best returning corner for next year…

With the changes to the portal window, I’ll be surprised if Merk isn’t gone. I thought he would fight for the job in the spring but I bet he’s gone and we’ll have to find a quality backup QB in the portal…
 
#67
#67
If Heupel goes to the portal for an experienced QB, G-Mac might fear losing the competition for QB1. If he does, he's got to fear losing out to Faizon the next year for QB1.

If Heupel doesn't go to the portal for experience and Merk leaves, we have to roll with an untested G-Mac or true FR Faizon at QB.

That's a lot of pressure on G-Mac either way.

GMac has seen that Heupel can't develop a young quarterback, an offensive line or a wide receiver corp all at the same time. Everybody with the exception of the Nico experiment has been an upper classman, most with 3 years of experience to take the helm under Heupel.

Heupel had no idea who Joey was until Nico upset the process and Joey was the odd man out all the way out at UCLA. Joey's fundamentals are middle of the road, he is prone to throw off his back foot on most passes, is prone to miss the wide open receiver moving out of the pressure, but gives it all that he has on every play, his limitations were fully exposed Saturday night.

Not sure GMac would want to slide into this framework next year if Heupel goes into the portal for another QB with experience, with a zero defense all the way around and nothing that would indicate next year will be any better. The 2026 schedule is infinitely more difficult next year such that there isn't much indication next year will be much of an improvement over this year. As the team regresses and worsens as the season progresses, the fans and the media are not the only ones who see the herculean challenge on the horizon known as 2026.

If Heupel can only get to 7-5 this year, it will be hard to see how 2026 would be much better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SayUWantAreVOLution
#71
#71
GMac has seen that Heupel can't develop a young quarterback, an offensive line or a wide receiver corp all at the same time. Everybody with the exception of the Nico experiment has been an upper classman, most with 3 years of experience to take the helm under Heupel.

Heupel had no idea who Joey was until Nico upset the process and Joey was the odd man out all the way out at UCLA. Joey's fundamentals are middle of the road, he is prone to throw off his back foot on most passes, is prone to miss the wide open receiver moving out of the pressure, but gives it all that he has on every play, his limitations were fully exposed Saturday night.

Not sure GMac would want to slide into this framework next year if Heupel goes into the portal for another QB with experience, with a zero defense all the way around and nothing that would indicate next year will be any better. The 2026 schedule is infinitely more difficult next year such that there isn't much indication next year will be much of an improvement over this year. As the team regresses and worsens as the season progresses, the fans and the media are not the only ones who see the herculean challenge on the horizon known as 2026.

If Heupel can only get to 7-5 this year, it will be hard to see how 2026 would be much better.
I see our receivers as above average. No real complaints there.

For the last couple of years our O Line has been sketchy BUT Glen Elarbee is arguably Josh Heupel's best friend. He's probably not going anywhere unless someone offers him a HC position, which frankly his performance here hasn't earned him. This is a problem.

The QB issue this year has created a problem. I'm guessing but I'm assuming Heupel took Joey A and developed him so quickly as the starter because Merk nor G-Mac were going to be better than Joey A.

We were not in a good spot AT ALL after Nico left and it's likely Nico's team KNEW what we had sitting behind him when they pulled their crap. They tried to squeeze us, in part, because Merk and G-Mac weren't ready and Heupel would have to gamble on someone like Joey A.

Joey's a gamer. He's obviously bright enough to run the offense reasonably comfortably but he's lacking in fundamentals and simply in the God given gifts an SEC QB needs to be elite. He's done well and I'm thankful for him. He didn't ask for his career to go the way it has. He should be at a school like UCLA, not UT. That's not a slight but simply reality.

Neither Merk, a year in and recruited to this level, nor G-Mac, a true freshman and highly recruited at the highest levels, have been able to progress well enough to beat Joey A's grit and experience.

Merk almost certainly leaves and drops a notch to the ACC or Big 12.

If we can recruit over G-Mac, there's a strong chance he leaves too if Faizon is here and looks strong.

The $9M / yr question is becoming when does a HEUPEL SELECTED QB pan out? Heupel's resume with QBs is solid in the past but at UT:

Milton was passable but not brilliant
Nico is a head case and didn't develop well
Merk appears to not be developing
G-Mac remains a question mark at this point

If neither G-Mac nor Faizon pan out, Houston we have a problem.
 
Advertisement





Back
Top