And what evidence do you have to back up the fact that he treats them worse than any other coach? There is nothing to suggest that, in fact he has shown that he will give them a chance (i.e. toney)
That's funny. Most of the vets on the team notice the difference and have commented on it.
Take him seriously in the unlikely event that he puts up back to back 100 yard games this fall.
Spring scrimmages are littered with unknown heroes that never do anything again. It's just the nature of the beast. Maybe starters chill a bit, and the walk-on's do their best to prove themselves. But when game time rolls around, the real talent shows itself.
And at most these vets have played for one other coach, not near enough sample size to show that Dooley treats them worse than other coaches at Division I programs. Walkons get treated like ****, that is just coaches have 85 scholarship players and are only allowed 9 coaches giving them a ratio of 1 coach:9.5 scholarship players. Coaches are already spread pretty thin and are paid to win, therefore they are going to focus on the players that will help them do so. How do you think Saban treats walkons?
This. Alot of people can have big days vs the Teagues of the world, we need Bonner to come in and be as advertised. Also looking more likely that we will need CP to come in and be as advertised. I was hoping Dallas would really step it up this spring and could be that third wide reciever while patterson adjusts, but he has seemed to be rather quiet.