curriei was the point man for haslam. schiano was all haslam and currie. that much is a known.
then sunday happened, and scramble mode commensed. and they started going down their list.
as each coach started to say no, at some point, probably have Doeren said no, Currie realizes the jig is up and he's the one on the hook, so he goes rogue in an attempt to get a deal done with a coach that might please enough to save his job.
but by then it's too late. Fulmer, Anderson, Thorton and other UTAD officals against all this, and wanting to take control away from Haslam, go to BD and say "this is what's going down, get that guy off the road, and he needs to be fired. you want to be on the right side of this". so she does just that, but he's already in CA, or on the way.
so he gets back, has the meeting this morning, and he's out. removing currie was the major step in neutering haslam. and once fulmer got the nod for the AD intstead of haslam's stooge Stigmon, it was over. haslams influence, effectively removed from the decision making process as to what happens next with this program.
Currie has culpability here, but he is really a pawn of haslam's in the end. feel bad for him or don't, doesn't matter, there was no way he was surviving this.