appyvol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 27, 2012
- Messages
- 5,068
- Likes
- 6,149
Expand our reach, play UNC, neutral site game every year before the first bye. Rotate cites:
Ontario, Canada
Mexico City, Mexico
Seoul, South Korea
Frankfort, Germany
Vinchensa, Italy
ETC, ETC, ETC!
We can take over the world Brain!
IIRC didn't we have a man clotheslined by a guy off the UCLA bench on a sure pick 6 running up the sideline. That really kicked up the intensity of this game for a while. Then it just fizzled out.That game vs Prothro's Bruins put UT back on the path toward football greatness and was considered s major upset. I tecall Prothro bitching about the officiating by the SEC crew, accusing them of regional bias and saying he was ashamed to be from the south.
MTSU!
Actually, I'd like to see the Vols rotate between Memphis, MTSU, UT Chatanooga and ETSU for one of their OOC games.
Mixed in with one cross-conference rivalry game like VT or UNC, one marquee game from a P5 and one cupcake G5 or FCS.
As of today..........four "guaranteed" loses doesn't help. And, when UT gets back to being competitive with those SEC schools, why in the world would you want another "50/50" game added every year. Makes zero sense. You could run the table in the East, lose to Bama and OK and have no chance to win the NC with two losses.Playing Oklahoma doesn’t impact us winning the SEC East. Why not?
Because we actually recruited better nationally when we played better P5 competition. Kids do not want to come here to play OVC or Sunbelt teams. I think one of the weaknesses of our program is we have a lack of headliner games as compared to other programs. We were a much better program when we sought to be the best and played the best competition. Even the fans are getting tired of paying premium prices for weak opposition when there are much better games on TV at home most Saturdays.As of today..........four "guaranteed" loses doesn't help. And, when UT gets back to being competitive with those SEC schools, why in the world would you want another "50/50" game added every year. Makes zero sense. You could run the table in the East, lose to Bama and OK and have no chance to win the NC with two losses.
I'm all for a (1) quality OC game. Topic was an "annual" game, and Oklahoma would not be a choice for me. FSU absolutely did that (look at their '81 schedule), but they were also an independent and didn't have set games with GA, Bama, the rest of the SEC, and a good UF (UF sucked then).Because we actually recruited better nationally when we played better P5 competition. Kids do not want to come here to play OVC or Sunbelt teams. I think one of the weaknesses of our program is we have a lack of headliner games as compared to other programs. We were a much better program when we sought to be the best and played the best competition. Even the fans are getting tired of paying premium prices for weak opposition when there are much better games on TV at home most Saturdays.
And if you think our schedule is difficult because of conference schedule maybe we are in the wrong conference. If you set your goal to be mediocre then you are likely to be there. Bobby Bowden took a bottom feeder program at FSU in the 1970’s and built them into a nationals powerhouse when he said they would play anybody anywhere. Same for Miami and Shnellenbarger.
Some SEC schools have an out of conference rivial = South Carolina vs Clemson, Georgia vs GT, Florida vs FSU, etc who do you see as a potential power 5 rival we could play annually?