Let me retract what I said this morning. If Jones does not announce something today or tomorrow, the less firm I am on Gruden. I thought he would resign. But obviously, this is not going to be the case. I will take my lumps...I was wrong!
I didn't see where anyone else mentioned this, but when Butch stepped off the plane in Knoxville almost 5 years ago, all he had signed was an MOU. Not one person was on here discussing if it was a legally binding document.
Why do some of you demand to believe in worst case scenarios?
The MOU is used for executing the agreement until a signed contract is in place.
Speaking for myself.
I'm not demanding anything. I'm just considering all possible scenarios.
When Gruden steps of the plane I'll stop considering all other scenarios.
I question anyone that seems to demand I believe what they believe, just because they believe it.
He did not have that MOU in his hand while a coach was on the payroll for coaching a game the night before is a point of fact. That is where one has to suspend rational thought 9and competent legal advice as well) to come to the point UTAD signed an MOU hiring Gruden when having a coach under contract for that position during the same time period. As a reminder CBJ is under contract for next season as well, no? Currie and CBJ both are on the public record during this supposed MOU hiring Gruden that CBJ was not terminated, his contract is unchanged and no one has suggested an amendment has been filed any where. Both are going to be proven liars after this is all said and done via the paperwork, you all signing up for that? So help me, this whole MOU hiring Gruden fig leaf depends on multiple secret agreements and secret documents that no one can produce or allow to be seen, just complete and utter heresay, amirite? That's where some of you purported attornies, of which I am not one but use the best around where I work, that's your position here, secret documents, secret agreements, secret abrogation of existing contracts, heresay, how does that hold up in a court of law?
SIAP...HankHill in the RF(somehow connected to the team. Talks of being at practices and on sideline) says there is lots of chatter around the office today of Butch resigning tomorrow. He says that there previously wasnt any chatter of this until today. TIFWIW
He did not have that MOU in his hand while a coach was on the payroll for coaching a game the night before is a point of fact. That is where one has to suspend rational thought 9and competent legal advice as well) to come to the point UTAD signed an MOU hiring Gruden when having a coach under contract for that position during the same time period. As a reminder CBJ is under contract for next season as well, no? Currie and CBJ both are on the public record during this supposed MOU hiring Gruden that CBJ was not terminated, his contract is unchanged and no one has suggested an amendment has been filed any where. Both are going to be proven liars after this is all said and done via the paperwork, you all signing up for that? So help me, this whole MOU hiring Gruden fig leaf depends on multiple secret agreements and secret documents that no one can produce or allow to be seen, just complete and utter heresay, amirite? That's where some of you purported attornies, of which I am not one but use the best around where I work, that's your position here, secret documents, secret agreements, secret abrogation of existing contracts, heresay, how does that hold up in a court of law?
I agree with all of this. But, how would a public records request play in? I don't know because that is not my area. There are certain exceptions in the statute, ie business development ect. I just do not know the answer.