Power T-Rev
Tennessee is bad for your health
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2011
- Messages
- 14,463
- Likes
- 19,892
Which reinforces my belief that he has already been informed of his termination. If they were looking for any other excuse to pull the trigger, there have been more than enough the last 2 weeks to do that. Why they keep trotting him out there is the big mystery that everybody has their thoughts on.
This^^^^. I have said all along it wont be Gruden and I know some have said Im a negavol, etc. The information I get has told me Gruden was not in play because they are not going to give a coach control of the football program, thus no major coach will come and take the job if he is not allowed to control the program. Its not a money issue. BTW, this is the only way Saban took the Bama job and if you remember at 10pm he said he would not be the coach at Bama, then in the middle of the night hired is because they gave him the control he was asking for.
At this point our best bet would be Les Miles.
John currie is a loser and a clown
There is a lot of confusion in this thread, especially for newcomers. Ones who have been here a while can probably ignore this, but much of the confusion and contradicting information can be harmonized by understanding a few basic concepts regarding who has the authority to do what with respect to the university. The easiest way to explain this is to state what appears to have happened thus far:
A large faction of boosters (85%, lead by Ergen) want JG. At some point, this group contacted JG and reached an agreement in principle on what it would take for JG to take the job (i.e., if the university agrees to all of these things, JG agrees that he would take the job). This is the done deal that MIT refers to. However, this is not an actual agreement with the university, as the boosters lack the legal authority to enter into an agreement on behalf of the university. But there is a done deal in the sense that it is known what it will take to get JG. Thus the media report that the university has offered JG $10M; bad reporting, as the agreement in question was not likely offered by the university officially, but the agreement in principle with the boosters.
So, there is an agreement in principal with JG. However, the booster faction knows (based on the events of 2012) that the trick is getting the university to officially agree to the deal (because of resistance from the other 15% of boosters, including Haslam). Thus they put in place a series of incentives to induce the university and the 15% holdout boosters to agree, including withdrawal of booster money (by the 85%); venture capital for the academic side; inciting the fan base into a frenzy; something as yet unknown by PM; and presumably some other things of which we are not yet aware.
It would appear that we are now at the stage of getting the university to officially agree to the agreement in principle established between JG and the 85% booster faction. As anticipated, there is resistance. The universitys official representatives (Currie, backed by Haslam) balk at the agreement in principle. Certain media sources and/or insiders report that other candidates are under consideration, and that the JG deal is dead, or that no talks have ever been had with JG, etc. Those reports are true in the sense that the university (i.e., its official representatives) have had no part in the agreement in principle and have initially rejected it. Further, official university representatives have had no direct contract with Gruden. The same is likely true in 2012 and would explain why JG might say he was never contacted then a true statement if it is recognized that hes referring to official university representatives.
Essentially, if you consider who has the official capacity to do what, the picture can be largely clarified. It seems that we are currently at the stage where the 85% booster faction is applying their leverage to convince the university itself (i.e., official university representatives) to agree to the agreement in principle with JG. Until that either fails or succeeds, BJ will likely remain the head coach.
Im hearing differently...dish network owner one of our big money guy is pushing hard for gruden!This^^^^. I have said all along it wont be Gruden and I know some have said Im a negavol, etc. The information I get has told me Gruden was not in play because they are not going to give a coach control of the football program, thus no major coach will come and take the job if he is not allowed to control the program. Its not a money issue. BTW, this is the only way Saban took the Bama job and if you remember at 10pm he said he would not be the coach at Bama, then in the middle of the night hired is because they gave him the control he was asking for.
At this point our best bet would be Les Miles.
I think we need to be more patient and allow Currie to do his job. I mean he just secured funding of $180 million for Neyland Stadium renovations. This does not paint the picture of a man willing to settle for mediocrity and the BOT must agree. I would love to have Gruden, but he may have his eyes on another coach and is waiting for the season to end to have formal discussions. Also, MNF doesn't end till Dec 25th and it just isn't logical for Gruden to abandon his post or announce anything mid-season. Saban wasn't announced until Jan 4th. Until Butch completely loses the locker room, he is still our best option for winning and to save face for the program. Based on what we have seen so far, I feel it will be after the season is over till anything major is announced. I know it's not what we want to hear, but patience my fellow Volunteers.
There is a lot of confusion in this thread, especially for newcomers. Ones who have been here a while can probably ignore this, but much of the confusion and contradicting information can be harmonized by understanding a few basic concepts regarding who has the authority to do what with respect to the university. The easiest way to explain this is to state what appears to have happened thus far:
A large faction of boosters (85%, lead by Ergen) want JG. At some point, this group contacted JG and reached an agreement in principle on what it would take for JG to take the job (i.e., if the university agrees to all of these things, JG agrees that he would take the job). This is the done deal that MIT refers to. However, this is not an actual agreement with the university, as the boosters lack the legal authority to enter into an agreement on behalf of the university. But there is a done deal in the sense that it is known what it will take to get JG. Thus the media report that the university has offered JG $10M; bad reporting, as the agreement in question was not likely offered by the university officially, but the agreement in principle with the boosters.
So, there is an agreement in principal with JG. However, the booster faction knows (based on the events of 2012) that the trick is getting the university to officially agree to the deal (because of resistance from the other 15% of boosters, including Haslam). Thus they put in place a series of incentives to induce the university and the 15% holdout boosters to agree, including withdrawal of booster money (by the 85%); venture capital for the academic side; inciting the fan base into a frenzy; something as yet unknown by PM; and presumably some other things of which we are not yet aware.
It would appear that we are now at the stage of getting the university to officially agree to the agreement in principle established between JG and the 85% booster faction. As anticipated, there is resistance. The universitys official representatives (Currie, backed by Haslam) balk at the agreement in principle. Certain media sources and/or insiders report that other candidates are under consideration, and that the JG deal is dead, or that no talks have ever been had with JG, etc. Those reports are true in the sense that the university (i.e., its official representatives) have had no part in the agreement in principle and have initially rejected it. Further, official university representatives have had no direct contract with Gruden. The same is likely true in 2012 and would explain why JG might say he was never contacted then a true statement if it is recognized that hes referring to official university representatives.
Essentially, if you consider who has the official capacity to do what, the picture can be largely clarified. It seems that we are currently at the stage where the 85% booster faction is applying their leverage to convince the university itself (i.e., official university representatives) to agree to the agreement in principle with JG. Until that either fails or succeeds, BJ will likely remain the head coach.
Currie will come out of this one of two ways:
1. The most incompetent AD we've ever had (Butch stays / hires google coach)
2. The best AD we've ever had (hires Gruden)
This is why I'm reserving judgement on Currie until we see the results of all this. I don't care what happens for the rest of this season if Gruden is on the sidelines in 2018.
I think we need to be more patient and allow Currie to do his job. I mean he just secured funding of $180 million for Neyland Stadium renovations. This does not paint the picture of a man willing to settle for mediocrity and the BOT must agree. I would love to have Gruden, but he may have his eyes on another coach and is waiting for the season to end to have formal discussions. Also, MNF doesn't end till Dec 25th and it just isn't logical for Gruden to abandon his post or announce anything mid-season. Saban wasn't announced until Jan 4th. Until Butch completely loses the locker room, he is still our best option for winning and to save face for the program. Based on what we have seen so far, I feel it will be after the season is over till anything major is announced. I know it's not what we want to hear, but patience my fellow Volunteers.
There is a lot of confusion in this thread, especially for newcomers. Ones who have been here a while can probably ignore this, but much of the confusion and contradicting information can be harmonized by understanding a few basic concepts regarding who has the authority to do what with respect to the university. The easiest way to explain this is to state what appears to have happened thus far:
A large faction of boosters (85%, lead by Ergen) want JG. At some point, this group contacted JG and reached an agreement in principle on what it would take for JG to take the job (i.e., if the university agrees to all of these things, JG agrees that he would take the job). This is the done deal that MIT refers to. However, this is not an actual agreement with the university, as the boosters lack the legal authority to enter into an agreement on behalf of the university. But there is a done deal in the sense that it is known what it will take to get JG. Thus the media report that the university has offered JG $10M; bad reporting, as the agreement in question was not likely offered by the university officially, but the agreement in principle with the boosters.
So, there is an agreement in principal with JG. However, the booster faction knows (based on the events of 2012) that the trick is getting the university to officially agree to the deal (because of resistance from the other 15% of boosters, including Haslam). Thus they put in place a series of incentives to induce the university and the 15% holdout boosters to agree, including withdrawal of booster money (by the 85%); venture capital for the academic side; inciting the fan base into a frenzy; something as yet unknown by PM; and presumably some other things of which we are not yet aware.
It would appear that we are now at the stage of getting the university to officially agree to the agreement in principle established between JG and the 85% booster faction. As anticipated, there is resistance. The universitys official representatives (Currie, backed by Haslam) balk at the agreement in principle. Certain media sources and/or insiders report that other candidates are under consideration, and that the JG deal is dead, or that no talks have ever been had with JG, etc. Those reports are true in the sense that the university (i.e., its official representatives) have had no part in the agreement in principle and have initially rejected it. Further, official university representatives have had no direct contract with Gruden. The same is likely true in 2012 and would explain why JG might say he was never contacted then a true statement if it is recognized that hes referring to official university representatives.
Essentially, if you consider who has the official capacity to do what, the picture can be largely clarified. It seems that we are currently at the stage where the 85% booster faction is applying their leverage to convince the university itself (i.e., official university representatives) to agree to the agreement in principle with JG. Until that either fails or succeeds, BJ will likely remain the head coach.
I'm fully in the Gruden camp for several reasons, the main one being a Tennessee connection. As tenuous as it is, he at least has some history to knowing who we are, what we were, and what we are supposed to be. He has family that is invested in this University. We have gotten away from that connection, and no longer know who we are. That's important to me. Add in his experience, and his name and you have an instant shot in the arm to a failing program.
There are others, who I am sure would be wildly successful here....those are the ones on my personal list. But JG, to me, is the only one that checks off the intangible boxes that will help bring back the greatness we have previously enjoyed.
We will likely have other opportunities in the future to infuse some Orange blood back into the program...but he seems to be the only one suited for today.