Boomer_Vol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2012
- Messages
- 235
- Likes
- 296
Dave Hart will be to landing Gruden what James Wilhoit was to beating Florida in 2004. Goat to hero. Wilhoit's miss was an accident, though. Smoke and mirrors. And I'm not buying that Dave Hart is so inept as to just realize this morning there were "rumors" going around. "Courtesy call?" Here's my call: BS.
No "inside sources" here, just common sense. The craziest thing about today is how quickly the majority of folks have dismissed the possibility of Gruden still coming to UT. And based on what? A statement from Gruden's agent, and another statement from another "unnamed source"" (a UT employee who wasn't supposed to say anything so he had to speak anonymously)?
I read the quote from Gruden's agent in the KNS. Are they the only organization he spoke to? And if so, did KNS call him or did he call KNS?
Was Ron Higgins duped by a source a while back when he tweeted of a major deal being planned to present to Gruden?
Was Glenn Carver stupid enough to base his report (Brown ownership stake) based on some second hand or internet message board? Ditto for Steven Hargis.
But move on folks, nothing to see here. Hyams and KNS said so, based on their "inside sources" which I'm guessing to be UTAD folks spinning for their own benefit.
Just my two cents. Flame away.
Dave Hart will be to landing Gruden what James Wilhoit was to beating Florida in 2004. Goat to hero. Wilhoit's miss was an accident, though. Smoke and mirrors. And I'm not buying that Dave Hart is so inept as to just realize this morning there were "rumors" going around. "Courtesy call?" Here's my call: BS.
No "inside sources" here, just common sense. The craziest thing about today is how quickly the majority of folks have dismissed the possibility of Gruden still coming to UT. And based on what? A statement from Gruden's agent, and another statement from another "unnamed source"" (a UT employee who wasn't supposed to say anything so he had to speak anonymously)?
I read the quote from Gruden's agent in the KNS. Are they the only organization he spoke to? And if so, did KNS call him or did he call KNS?
Was Ron Higgins duped by a source a while back when he tweeted of a major deal being planned to present to Gruden?
Was Glenn Carver stupid enough to base his report (Brown ownership stake) based on some second hand or internet message board? Ditto for Steven Hargis.
But move on folks, nothing to see here. Hyams and KNS said so, based on their "inside sources" which I'm guessing to be UTAD folks spinning for their own benefit.
Just my two cents. Flame away.
I don't know the answers to those questions either. It's possible things could get back on track, but that was not the tone of things last night. One thing seems clear to me -- this is not a smokescreen or media campaign. The deal soured.
Guys, I had to work today so wasn't here a lot, but I'm still confident after speaking with my source earlier today. It just makes no sense that Hart f'ed this up. Not if he wants to keep his job, or hold any other job.
I called a presser today, it didn't happen. Here to eat my crow, but I'm not wavering. Still confident this gets done. Flame away.
I know it may be speculation, but what do you think?
Hubbs has changed a few times on his positions as has everyone..
So what do you think about these new developments about boosters and who's got control and if they're even pulling in different directions?
Perhaps the Strong and Fedora interviews are Hart's counter to the Gruden demands. "Jon, if you truly want to be here, you're on borrowed time to reach an agreement because we're moving forward, without you if necessary."
I don't know the answers to those questions either. It's possible things could get back on track, but that was not the tone of things last night. One thing seems clear to me -- this is not a smokescreen or media campaign. The deal soured.
Gruden wanted to be here. That's the sad part, if this doesn't get done. It's not a smokescreen. Hart does not want him as our head coach.
Perhaps the Strong and Fedora interviews are Hart's counter to the Gruden demands. "Jon, if you truly want to be here, you're on borrowed time to reach an agreement because we're moving forward, without you if necessary."
Off topic ... sort of , but am I the only one who found it a little odd , that when all of these threads were taking off , Saban was sending recruits quotes with a picture and bio of Jon? It was like the word was getting out , and he wanted to get a step ahead of him. Now , the stuff being said on the radio , is basically that Nick has let it be known he doesn't want Gruden to get this job. Hart seems to be the problem , and we know where he came from. So what is in it for him? A job replacing Mal Moore. It sounded a little far fetched at first. Now the 'Don't burn that bridge , Dave' story really is starting to make sense. I'm not 100% sure , because I still think Hart can prove us wrong. But at this point , I have no reason to believe he will. All signs point to him being the issue. Gruden is the only name out there we can get that would instantly get people to look this way. Away from the midget. With the Dooley being retained , if he went to a bowl game story , and everything else , it just seems a little shady around here.
I want to believe his is doing a job that is in favor of Tennessee , but can anyone really belive that right now? Gruden was not even at the top of his list? Really? Control is an issue , and you have been dealing with Nick Saban for the past few years? Don't piss on my leg , and tell me it's raining , Hart.
FYI
I tweeted with Evan Woodberry who broke the story with the LaMonte quotes that Gruden wasn't coming to UT. Woodberry said that he actually spoke to LaMonte. He said that he had been texting emailing and calling LaMonte for about a week and today LaMonte called him back today and discussed the Gruden situation.
I wonder why LaMonte went with Woodberry but no one has been able to explain that to me.