What makes you think it's a "simpleton" contract? Does that mean the University was represented by simpletons too? This isn't their first rodeo (nor Dooley's agent's), and the contract doesn't look bad or particularly unusual to me. As I said, UT may try to use the UNC issue as leverage in negotiating a buyout, but I doubt they'd try to go to the mat over a significantly reduced buyout unless something more significant comes out than has so far (the UNC issue and his throwing players under the bus). Now his alleged altercation with Hart yesterday might have the potential to be more dangerous to him, but we don't know the details, and it would have to have been horrendously bad to justify a termination without cause rather than a warning, etc.