mccrackb
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2013
- Messages
- 1,120
- Likes
- 919
a ban isn't permanent is it? I mean I'm sure if the offense was bad enough, but I don't remember seeing anything that was crazy over the top
a ban isn't permanent is it? I mean I'm sure if the offense was bad enough, but I don't remember seeing anything that was crazy over the top
This is what it sounds like to me: AV is possibly the most trusted (and liked) insider who posts here. Some time ago he said that, as far as he was concerned, the deal was done and that we wouldn't hear from him again unless it was bad news. He did show up again before the LSU game to give away several tickets to the game, so not necessarily a bad sign. His most recent post, however, seems to signify, however, the bad news since, in it, he suggests that the deal is not done adding that the AD can't force Gruden's hand.
Someone else posted this date a couple of days ago as well
I only heard about 20 min of it . He did say 12/10 was the date recruits have been told. HIS idea on a coach was a) SEC coach of a coach with SEC experience b) A power 5 coach c) An assistant coach with SEC ties. He also said that the people that have nmade the calls for the coaches over the last 15 years will probably be making some of the calls this time and he did menton the Haslams by name.
He also talked about who HE thought should be in on the search and that included Fulmer, Peyton and Charles Davis. He said Fulmer works for the UT Pres. and hasn't had that much input as far as he knows.
That is just about all I got from the time I listened.
So I see that there is now an official Non-Gruden thread. I'm confused is that where us Grudenites are supposed to go spew how anybody other that Gruden is dumpster fire material with as much vitriol as humanly (or non-humanly) possible and try to convince the masses in the thread how ignorant they are and they should not procreate. I only ask because I think that is what the Non-Gruden crowd thinks these threads are for.
I kid. I kid. Kind of.