Official Global Warming thread (merged)

Never claimed that it did. You asked me to explain my statement how large natural climate cycles are the dominate cycles. I attempted to use this study to explain it to you.

I don't see how it being longer makes it dominant. Maybe we don't agree on what "dominant" means in this context.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
I encourage you to research how we know the temperature in the distant past, how much methane comes from humans vs cattle vs rice (most come from rice production, we just can't tell billions of people to starve), and answer these questions for yourself.

Or you can just make juvenile jokes geared towards amusing the lowest common denominator. Whichever.

It's actually more amusing to see those like you and Bart post in this thread like either of you actually know what you're talking about. You don't. I don't either.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
It's actually more amusing to see those like you and Bart post in this thread like either of you actually know what you're talking about. You don't. I don't either.
Speak for yourself champ. What's amusing is your and SandVol's recent arguments (admissions?) that you have no idea what you're talking about...

You changed your mind about vaccines. You even made a whole thread about how much you love science. So why do you continue to reject the overwhelming scientific consensus on evolution and climate change?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
cadrqr2ugae8qqj.jpg


Guys... It's too hot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
Speak for yourself champ. What's amusing is your and SandVol's recent arguments (admissions?) that you have no idea what you're talking about...

You changed your mind about vaccines. You even made a whole thread about how much you love science. So why do you continue to reject the overwhelming scientific consensus on evolution and climate change?

I'm splitting a rib.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
America has a lot of real problems to work on that we can actually solve. Climate isn't one of them. Like I've said before, wake me up when Florida is under water.
 
NASA adjusts their temp data. Because apparently tempature data needs to be adjusted for some reason

Much like the opposite of the GDP numbers where the projections fit the equation and then are adjusted to actual numbers, the actual temps are adjusted to fit the equation. One is the fudge factor and one is the finagle factor. I can't remember which is which.
 
It's actually more amusing to see those like you and Bart post in this thread like either of you actually know what you're talking about. You don't. I don't either.

Arm a tree hugger with bad data and just sit back and watch. It's like the wreck at the end of Talladega Nights. You just can't turn away no matter how bad it gets.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
America has a lot of real problems to work on that we can actually solve. Climate isn't one of them. Like I've said before, wake me up when Florida is under water.

That's a super idea! Let's wait to fix a problem until it's way too late, and the damage is done.

Similarly, I'm going to keep smoking my cigarettes. Wake me up when I have stage 4 lung cancer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
It's cute that you think people can "fix" the climate.

It's depressing that you A) think that "fixing" is an all or nothing concept, and that we can only "fix" a climate issue by completely determining the makeup and path of the Earth's climate, and B) that you apparently, by the nature of your comment, think that the climate is entirely out of the hands of humans.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
It's depressing that you A) think that "fixing" is an all or nothing concept, and that we can only "fix" a climate issue by completely determining the makeup and path of the Earth's climate, and B) that you apparently, by the nature of your comment, think that the climate is entirely out of the hands of humans.

Sigh. What are your specific proposals?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people

Advertisement



Back
Top