Notice of Trial: Behr vs Souce

#53
#53
But my reason for the trial in the first place is your client invited the person that does all that to the Zone and deserves punishment.

It seems you agree your client is guilty but deserves no punishment. Is that correct?

Your witness testified to that. My client pleads the fif since he don't answer questions.

I find your witness to be unreliable and prone to making inaccurate statements. That is reasonable doubt.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 82_VOL_83
#56
#56
Your witness testified to that. My client pleads the fif since he don't answer questions.

I find your witness to be unreliable and prone to making inaccurate statements. That is reasonable doubt.
Hey now, if I’m a witness, I’d rather be yours. 😉
 
#57
#57
Your witness testified to that. My client pleads the fif since he don't answer questions.

I find your witness to be unreliable and prone to making inaccurate statements. That is reasonable doubt.
^^^^^^^That's the reason your stupid client is on trial.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 82_VOL_83
#67
#67
I submit to the Zoners that souces "Lawyer" has been arguing his case for 3 pages and has mocked me and this court, and has ignored the charges.

She has used my evidence as evidence to prove her client is guilty. She has made a mockery of this entire system. That alone is evidence of her being a legal participant in the Zone, but it also shows souces guilt.
 
Advertisement

Back
Top