dduncan4163
Have at it Hoss
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2006
- Messages
- 22,460
- Likes
- 47,766
Why would you even want arch at this point? We got a top 5 overall prospect in nico. And consider this…he’s garnered all the attention he has with no famous family connection. It’s highly possible that he ends up better than arch. And he’s out there working hard to bring other great prospects to Tennessee. Not that it’s a requirement but arch being slow on the trail means whatever team he ends up at won’t have had him helping the class for long. We are a loyal fan base. And if an elite qb is going to go all in with us we need to go all in with him. And for the most part I think that’s what we’re doing.
Manning would not have survived in this offense ....any Manning.. SACK!!
I think many are forgetting we landed another highly rated qb the same year we landed Peyton. And had this board been around many on here would have ripped young Manning to shreds.
I for one thought Branndon would be the better qb. However after a few games it became obvious that Manning was a more polished qb even though Stewart had more athletic skills.
If we land Arch and Nico...im pulling for both.
How so? Genuinely curious. Does he have a slow release or is slow at orchestrating a hurry up offense/making quick decisions like HB was?Arch isn't really a great fit for Heupel style of offense IMHO.
He literally averaged over 9 YPC last year lol. He's more like his grandpa than uncle. Better runner than Nico, not that running is all that important in this hybrid veer-air raid offense. That would be more of a Butch read-option offense.Manning would not have survived in this offense ....any Manning.. SACK!!
An offense that thrives on creating match up advantages and operating quickly wouldn't have been good for PM? Disagree completely. His greatest strength was always reading and decision making. This O favors someone who excels at quick decisions.Manning would not have survived in this offense ....any Manning.. SACK!!
We obviously didn’t have the same types of tools back then that we have today however… I hardly think Brandon Stewart was in the same category of hype that Nico is. And really my big point is that Nico has really taken it upon himself to try to build a special class here.
It’s all really irreverent anyway because Arch seems to have no interest in being here.
We don’t want Manning so that would be strange.It would be a hoot if QBs under Heupel end up having outstanding seasons, end winning or nearly winning the Heisman, and the result being Arch Manning decides to come to Tennessee. Not likely, but it'd be a hoot if did happen.
View attachment 461581have happened. But personally, I think the reality is he will end with (gagging) Kiffin, Mike Leach, or Riley.
You think he's a better runner than Nico?He literally averaged over 9 YPC last year lol. He's more like his grandpa than uncle. Better runner than Nico, not that running is all that important in this hybrid veer-air raid offense. That would be more of a Butch read-option offense.
Arch is talented.. but he is over hyped due to the manning name. I think the QB we have now is the best one in the class. Nico is the real deal.