And there's the 3 Card Monte. So be honest, are you really so dense as to not understand how poorly you've done citing someone who, in football parlance, would be one of the great "homerun threats" of all time (top 10 in the history of the game in both 50+ and 40+ games) in the context you did or have you realized that and are just trying to save face?
In any event, as pointed out earlier, that was a simply awful analogy attempt in the first place so you'd do well to avoid going back to it at all. What you should do is try to address the first post like there was more to it than just managing a 50+ run since that very, very much was the case. If you need a starting point go with this part:
As a complete back Hurd is unquestionably better but a "generational" talent isn't getting shown up in the breakaway threat dept by so many other players...including RB's from KY and Vandy. It just flat out doesn't reconcile.